Don Dailey wrote:

> In such a case, I think it's better for the human not to have a time
> control at all.   This is more satisfying than having a human lose on
> time, but giving the win to him anyway under the assumption that he
> didn't really need all that time even though he used it.

I think the problem is that in this case the match can't possibly show
anything.

-- 
GCP
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to