Don Dailey wrote: > In such a case, I think it's better for the human not to have a time > control at all. This is more satisfying than having a human lose on > time, but giving the win to him anyway under the assumption that he > didn't really need all that time even though he used it.
I think the problem is that in this case the match can't possibly show anything. -- GCP _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/