only if the human won all games and the machine didn't use opponent's time would that be true. any other combination would definitely show something.
s. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Gian-Carlo Pascutto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don Dailey wrote: > >> In such a case, I think it's better for the human not to have a time >> control at all. This is more satisfying than having a human lose on >> time, but giving the win to him anyway under the assumption that he >> didn't really need all that time even though he used it. > > I think the problem is that in this case the match can't possibly show > anything. > > -- > GCP > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
