On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:25:23 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Including the mention of an empty comment was my initiative. My thinking was 
> that now it isn't entirely clear if an empty comment would be allowed or 
> rejected. It's a special / corner-case value which could raise questions if 
> not mentioned. The current text specifies it as equivalent to null.

Also interesting to note that in the read side, in `ZipFile.getComment` we 
return null for an empty comment, not the empty string. So there is a 
distinction in that API, but not really on the write side.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30338#discussion_r2981210182

Reply via email to