David Laakso wrote: > Michael Venables wrote: > > > RE: <http://ronin-group.org/> > > Michael, > > My comments below have little if anything to do with CSS. They are > personal opinion... take them as such, and do with them as will... > [...] > > >>> 2/ Check your site in a 640 x 480, 800 x 600, 1024 x 768 window. >>> Note the clipping of the stuff at the bottom of the left column >>> in a "short window." >> This is one of those things that I wonder about every so often. I >> don't really track my visitor metrics, but my conclusion wound up >> being that I haven't seen anyone run something as small as 800 x >> 600 in so long that it's just not an issue. ...
FWIW - I work at a computer training lab that has workstations with 19" monitors, natively running at 1280 x 1024. I have noticed several students switching to 800 x 600 over the last year. I don't think this is necessarily age-related, either, as students doing this have been little more than half my age... Cordially, David -- ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
