Thank you so much Craig for your valuable feedback, all the details make perfect sense.
We will incorporate all the respective details in the proposal. - Thanks & Regards, Swapnil M Mane, www.apache.org On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 3:40 AM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Swapnil, > > I realize I'm coming late to this discussion but would like to offer a > small bit of feedback. > > Like others, I think we need to try to get qualified people running local > groups. One Member plus two PMC members gives us three, which is a magic > number for decision-making here. Even if they don't attend all meetings, > it's at least some oversight from folks who have earned merit. > > Random talks that present how we do things here, by people we don't know, > makes me nervous. We might consider requiring presentations to be posted > publicly some time (one week?) before the meeting which would allow for at > least some oversight. > > And there are plenty of such presentations publicly available and some can > be edited to suit (e.g. see the Training podling for examples of > presentations on The Apache Way). > > I endorse the concept and look forward to a proposal. > > Craig > > > On Dec 11, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Swapnil M Mane <swapnilmm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Thank you so much, everyone, for your kind and valuable inputs. > > As a next step, we will work on drafting the ALC proposal to the board. > > > > > > - Best regards, > > Swapnil M Mane, > > www.apache.org > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:20 AM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 12/6/19 4:42 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >>> One potential (if not solution -- but at least a line of thought) > could be > >>> to bring these efforts into the fold officially by requiring them to be > >>> official sub-projects of ComDev PMC. Then we can have a policy > requiring > >>> a certain governance oversight over those sub-projects (like requiring > >>> a certain # of PMC/members, etc.). > >> > >> This just feels like too much structure/bureaucracy to me. We want just > >> enough oversight, but we don't want to kill it with too much, either. > >> > >> If, at some later date, this grows to the point where it seems to *need* > >> this much oversight, then, great, we take that step then. > >> > >> Small, reversible steps. > >> > >> -- > >> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com > >> http://rcbowen.com/ > >> @rbowen > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Swapnil M Mane, www.apache.org
