So I found a Moz hacker whom can help. what time on Fri do you guys want to do this?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org>wrote: > I've managed to get this up and running now -- great work on this, Joe! > > Mobilespec runs on my N4, with 10 failing tests: 3 in contacts; 7 in > file-transfer. Otherwise, things seem to be working pretty well. > > I used a new build of Crosswalk, and found that the embedding API has > changed since the weekend (when Ningxin's patches applied). I've issued a > pull request at > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/5for it -- > I'm not sure if there's a way to keep compatibility with last > week's Crosswalk, or if we'd even want to. (Ningxin, if you could take a > look at that PR and see if it makes sense, I'd appreciate it) > > Joe, I also had to patch the default constructor for XWalkCordovaWebView; > it wasn't creating its own client objects, so it got the default ones, and > most of the tests were failing because some component of the bridge wan't > working. https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/4 is > out > for that. > > Count me in for the hangout -- this is exciting stuff > > Ian > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > Yup I'll track em down > > On Apr 23, 2014 7:17 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have a contact at moz that we could invite? > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > > > wrote: > > > > Depends on their interest level I think. Faster we can get this out > > > > the door the better. If we need to delay for geckoview, then I don't > > > > think we should gate on it, just release it after. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Tommy Williams <to...@devgeeks.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> More engines, more better... > > > >> On 23 Apr 2014 16:32, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hey > > > >>> > > > >>> A Hangout would have to happen on Friday at the earliest. It'd be > > > good if > > > >>> we could get someone from Mozilla on the hangout as well. I > haven't > > > gotten > > > >>> MozillaView (GeckoView with Cordova methods) fully working yet. > For > > > some > > > >>> reason it's not rendering on the screen. > > > >>> > > > >>> Ideally it'd be cool to have at least two options when this feature > > > finally > > > >>> lands. > > > >>> > > > >>> What do other people think? > > > >>> > > > >>> Joe > > > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" <ningxin...@intel.com> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > Joe, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > To pluggable webview interest group: > > > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction > and > > > >>> > discussion of next steps? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks, > > > >>> > -ningxin > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com] > > > >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM > > > >>> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > > >>> > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > The PoC is great! Quite excited about the direction! > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > I've sent a PR to update the cordova-crosswalk-engine to latest > > > >>> crosswalk > > > >>> > > embedding API. It works with xwalk_core_library at 6.35.124.0. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > I've also changed the CordovaWebView interface slightly (adding > > > >>> > getView() API) > > > >>> > > to allow XWalkCordovaWebView to composite a XWalkView instead > of > > > >>> > extending > > > >>> > > it. It resolves some API naming issues for XWalkView case. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Please review them at: > > > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/3 > > > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/pull/2 > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Thanks, > > > >>> > > -ningxin > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > > > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:45 AM > > > >>> > > > To: dev > > > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Yeah, I'd be cool with setting up a hangout. Everyone should > > > take a > > > >>> > > > look at the PoC, I've basically distilled it down to four or > > five > > > >>> > > > classes so far, but with some work, we may be able to get it > > > down to > > > >>> > > > three. Due to legacy, we're pretty stuck with the Android > > > WebView > > > >>> API > > > >>> > calls, > > > >>> > > but these can probably be modified. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > It'd be good to get Mozilla people on the call as well, since > > > they > > > >>> > > > have their WebView as well. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Hu, Ningxin < > > > ningxin...@intel.com> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > Hangout would be a good idea. > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > FYI, I will be off next week. How about the week after > next? > > > If it > > > >>> > > > > works, please > > > >>> > > > feel free to schedule one and count me in. > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, > > > >>> > > > > -ningxin > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > > > >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On > > Behalf > > > Of > > > >>> > > > >> Michal Mocny > > > >>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM > > > >>> > > > >> To: dev > > > >>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout some time to > > introduce > > > >>> > everyone? > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> Joe has been leading the effort here, but there are other > > > cordova > > > >>> > > > >> contributors for whom this is top priority. It would be > > nice > > > if > > > >>> we > > > >>> > > > >> could all meet to say hello and make sure we are all going > > in > > > the > > > >>> > > > >> right > > > >>> > > > direction. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> Quite exciting! > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> -Michal > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Hu, Ningxin < > > > >>> ningxin...@intel.com> > > > >>> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > Joe, thanks for this. I am very excited. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > FYI. Crosswalk team is working on refactoring the > WebView > > > API to > > > >>> > > > >> > support embedding usage better [1]. (Previously the > layer > > > API > > > >>> was > > > >>> > > > >> > not exposed as public usage). > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > I would like to review the PoC and work with you to get > > > >>> Crosswalk > > > >>> > > > >> > fits into the pluggable WebView architecture. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >>> > > > >> > -ningxin > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > > > >> > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > > > >>> > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:08 AM > > > >>> > > > >> > > To: dev > > > >>> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different > engines > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > Hey > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > After debugging, I did some minor updates to the > plugin > > > >>> README. > > > >>> > > > >> > > It > > > >>> > > > >> > should be > > > >>> > > > >> > > easier to get this up and running, although there's > > still > > > the > > > >>> > > > >> > > issue of > > > >>> > > > >> > after-install > > > >>> > > > >> > > hooks and the relative path weirdness with the > Crosswalk > > > >>> > Library itself. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > It still doesn't support the CLI at all, but it should > > be > > > >>> there > > > >>> > > > >> > > with the > > > >>> > > > >> > old flow. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Michal Mocny > > > >>> > > > >> > > <mmo...@chromium.org> > > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > > (Sorry Joe, Googlers are down in California and way > > > busy. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > Will be back in a week. Super excited about this, > > > though.) > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > -Michal > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > > <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Reviving this thread! > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Can other people look at this, and see if/when we > > > should > > > >>> > land this? > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> I know that I have to re-write the tests still, > but I > > > would > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> like some feedback before merging it in. Also, > it'd > > be > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> super awesome if other people could try and make a > > > WebView > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> based on the interfaces and recommend which methods > > > should > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> die. I want to get this released in the next month > > or > > > so, > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> so any time and feedback would be greatly > > appreciated. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Thanks > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Hey, I created the following today to track > various > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > WebView > > > >>> > > > >> > progresses: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246 > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > I also have this repo created. The licensing is > > > ugly as > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > all crap, but it's a Proof-Of-Concept: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > If I can get some help getting plugman to just > load > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Crosswalk, it'll > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> look hawt. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > BTW: We should probably get this ready to go into > > > Android > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > in the next two months and deprecate the > > setProperty > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > methods, since all properties should be > preferences > > > in > > > >>> > config.xml > > > >>> > > now. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Perhaps. There would be additional benefits to > > this > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> approach, namely fixes being added to that > > platform > > > more > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> quickly. I'll probably take a look at that > once I > > > have > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Crosswalk > > > >>> > > > finalized. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> <b...@brian.io> > > > >>> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> this is great stuff > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> do we think it may be possible to bring in > amazon > > > >>> fireos > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> stuff > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> eventually > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> too? > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main > > > Apache > > > >>> one. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Hey > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I just committed some code based on their > > > WebView > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > modifications that allows you to choose your > > > >>> renderer > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > in the > > > >>> > > > >> > config file > > > >>> > > > >> > > with this: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <preference name="webView" > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> value="org.apache.cordova.engine.crosswalk.XWalkCordo > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > va > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Web > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > View > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > " /> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > You currently have to copy over the *.pak > file > > > and > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > the jsapi from a Crosswalk Example project > to > > > get > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > this to work. The next thing that I'm going > > to > > > do > > > >>> is > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > figure out how to write this as a plugin and > > > have it > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > install on a default > > > >>> > > > project. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > Also, right now the bridge doesn't seem to > > > work, and > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I don't know why exactly. That being said, > > the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> fact > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > that I can choose which version of > > > Chrome/Chromium > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > I'm running with > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> a > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > single XML preference is HUGE. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > There's definitely a lot more work that > needs > > > to be > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > done, but as > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> long > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > as we have something that we can fit into > the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > interface, we should > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> be > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > able to put in things like GeckoView or > other > > > third > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > party > > > >>> > > > >> > renderers. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > The nightmare of being stuck with bullshit > > > WebView > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > bugs may soon be over. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > <mmo...@chromium.org> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordo > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> va > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> -an > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> droi > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> d > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> First patch they landed, which claims to > have > > > min > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> viable xwalk > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> webview: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-andro > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> id > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> /co > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> mmit > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> /a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04 > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal > Mocny > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> <mmo...@chromium.org > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> I haven't looked yet, but did you see: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordo > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> va > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> -an > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> droi > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> d > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> ? > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew > > > Grieve < > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> agri...@chromium.org > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> First - very excited that you're working > on > > > this! > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Had a quick look. Not sure there's much > to > > be > > > >>> > gleaned > > > >>> > > yet. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> Once > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> you > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> start > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think > > it > > > will > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> become more > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> obvious > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> what > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> the interface should look like. E.g., > does > > > x-walk > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> even have the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> concept of > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> ChromeClient vs WebViewClient vs WebView? > > > Also > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> unsure whether the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> class > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> should extend android.View as well as > > > implement > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> our > > > >>> > > > >> > interface. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> E.g. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> alternative is to have a "getView()" > method > > > on > > > >>> the > > > >>> > > > >> > interface. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Might > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> help > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> cut down on file sizes, and API surface, > > but > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> again, I'm not too > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> sure. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> I've been pretty hesitant to touch > existing > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed members > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> (e.g. the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> public fields you were referring to) > since > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> touching anything > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> public > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> could > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> break plugins. That said, maybe now is a > > good > > > >>> time > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> to @deprecate > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> a > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> bunch > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> of > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> them and either replace them with > getters, > > or > > > >>> just > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> declare them > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> to be > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> not > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> exposed to plugins. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joe > Bowser > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> <bows...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > So, after looking at the Crosswalk code > > > again, > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I've decided to > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> take > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> a > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > quick stab at making things pluggable. > I > > > don't > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > have a lot to > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> show > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> for > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > it, but with the help of Eclipse (which > > is > > > why > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > the generated interfaces look so > screwed > > > up), I > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > managed to create some > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> interfaces > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> so > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > we can start shoehorning in other > browser > > > >>> > renderers. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/pluggable_w > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> eb > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> vie > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> w > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I'm going to probably start with > > Crosswalk, > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > because it's > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> probably > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> the > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > most mature primary candidate in the > > > Android > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Third-Party > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> WebView > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > thing, and I'm pretty sure the > GeckoView > > > will > > > >>> be > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > happening > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> shortly > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > after. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > I don't know how this would work w.r.t. > > > the CLI > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > or our > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> workflow at > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > all, but at the moment, I really just > > want > > > to > > > >>> at > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > least start > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> to have > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > some headway towards 4.x and PhoneGap > > day. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > What do people think of this so far? > I'm > > > going > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > to try to clean > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> things > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > up a bit, since we've definitely done a > > > lot of > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > things that > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> would > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> make > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > first year CS profs freak the hell out > > > (i.e. > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > public members in > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> public > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > objects w.r.t. PluginManager). > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Thoughts? > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > Joe > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >
