OK, thanks for clarifying Steffen.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does > not break a .dsp build. > > My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable, > which is not true. > > > > On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: > > Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): > > Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. > > The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. > > I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ? > > > I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 / > VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the > http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on > Windows. > > > Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not? > > AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not > change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work), > he "just" added some .mak and .dep files. > Why would that break dsp files? > >
