Running now AL: mod_http2 (v1.4.4, nghttp2 1.8.0), initializing... Was running 1.2.8 (git).
Little confusing the version number httpd vs git (1.4.4 vs 1.2.8) Still worried about the memory footprint: Mod_http2 1.0.11 (2.4.18) average ~100 MB peaks with 200 MB. with 1.2.8 average ~200 MB with peaks ~600 MB. I shall keep an eye on 1.4.4. > Op 23 mrt. 2016 om 17:26 heeft Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > het volgende geschreven: > > Thanks, Steffen! > >> Am 23.03.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>: >> >> I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues. >> >> Build with SVN revision 1736328. >> >> Running looks also fine sofar. >> >> >> >>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping >>> for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to >>> have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait. >>> >>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my time) >>>> I can build. >>>> >>>> Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try. >>>> >>>> When I look to the changes, it should build. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you? >>>>> >>>>> THX!! >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe >>>>>> does not break a .dsp build. >>>>>> >>>>>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not >>>>>> usable, which is not true. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >>>>>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the >>>>>>>>> issue ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 / >>>>>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the >>>>>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> Windows. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not >>>>>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work), >>>>>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files. >>>>>>> Why would that break dsp files? >
