Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > > Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my time) I > can build. > > Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try. > > When I look to the changes, it should build. > > > > On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you? >> >> THX!! >> >>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >>> >>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does >>> not break a .dsp build. >>> >>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not >>> usable, which is not true. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: >>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. >>>>>> >>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the >>>>>> issue ? >>>>> >>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 / >>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the >>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on >>>>> Windows. >>>> >>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not? >>>> >>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not >>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work), >>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files. >>>> Why would that break dsp files? >>> >>> >> > >
