Thanks, Steffen!
> Am 23.03.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>:
>
> I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.
>
> Build with SVN revision 1736328.
>
> Running looks also fine sofar.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
>> for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to
>> have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my time)
>>> I can build.
>>>
>>> Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.
>>>
>>> When I look to the changes, it should build.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
>>>>
>>>> THX!!
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe
>>>>> does not break a .dsp build.
>>>>>
>>>>> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not
>>>>> usable, which is not true.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>>>>>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the
>>>>>>>> issue ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 /
>>>>>>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
>>>>>>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on
>>>>>>> Windows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
>>>>>> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
>>>>>> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
>>>>>> Why would that break dsp files?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
