I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.
Build with SVN revision 1736328.
Running looks also fine sofar.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to
have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my
time) I can build.
Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.
When I look to the changes, it should build.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
THX!!
On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe
does not break a .dsp build.
My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not
usable, which is not true.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl>
wrote:
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the
issue ?
I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11
/
VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the
http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd
on
Windows.
Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not?
AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not
change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work),
he "just" added some .mak and .dep files.
Why would that break dsp files?
