I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a very targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another 5-6 hours. Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the release, and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 is out.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fine with me. > > Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> a écrit : > >> Hi Adrien, >> >> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks ago >> and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests twice >> as well to verify. >> >> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the RC >>> build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to make >>> sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? >>> >>> >>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks! >>> >>> >>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki < >>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> Adrien, >>>> >>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly >>>> reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd. >>>> >>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Quick update: >>>> >>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, >>>> they will be in 7.2. >>>> >>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>>> >>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I >>>> don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release on >>>> it. >>>> >>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>>> >>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> +1 this is over due >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN >>>>> VIC) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 >>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>>>>> >>>>>> Christine >>>>>> >>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 12/01/17 10:11:59 >>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated >>>>>> a good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: >>>>>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please >>>>>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of >>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
