Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get SOLR-11624 in.
Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a very > targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another 5-6 > hours. > Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the release, > and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 is out. > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Fine with me. >> >> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> a écrit : >> >>> Hi Adrien, >>> >>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks >>> ago and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests >>> twice as well to verify. >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the RC >>>> build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to make >>>> sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? >>>> >>>> >>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki < >>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Adrien, >>>>> >>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly >>>>> reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd. >>>>> >>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Quick update: >>>>> >>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, >>>>> they will be in 7.2. >>>>> >>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>>>> >>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I >>>>> don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release on >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> +1 this is over due >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN >>>>>> VIC) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 >>>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christine >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 12/01/17 10:11:59 >>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated >>>>>>> a good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: >>>>>>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please >>>>>>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of >>>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
