dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene.Net.Util.SystemConsole throws not supported exception in .NET MAUI app running on android/iOS [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene.Net.Util.SystemConsole throws not supported exception in .NET MAUI app running on android/iOS [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Set license expression on nuget [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Set license expression on nuget [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Community over Code EU 2024: Start planning your trip! Ryan Skraba
• Participate in the ASF 25th Anniversary Campaign Brian Proffitt
• Community Over Code NA 2024 Travel Assistance Applications now open! Gavin McDonald
• [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Any plans for supporting .Net7.0 or .Net 8.0? [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] SWEEP: Reviewed usage of atomic numeric type methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SWEEP: Reviewed usage of atomic numeric type methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Lucene.Net.Search.ReferenceContext<T>: Converted to ref struct and reworked TestControlledRealTimeReopenThread.TestStraightForwardDemonstration() to verify functionality [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lucene.Net.Search.ReferenceContext<T>: Converted to ref struct and reworked TestControlledRealTimeReopenThread.TestStraightForwardDemonstration() to verify functionality [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Create Roslyn code analyzer to streamline review of proper usage of format/parse methods for numeric types [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix test name reporting when test is in a base class [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Add cancellation support to IndexSearcher [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Review formatting of boolean strings [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Review formatting of boolean strings (in ToString() methods and similar) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Review formatting of boolean strings (in ToString() methods and similar) [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Meta: Add Support unit tests [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Meta: Add Support unit tests [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Improve ICollector usage [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve ICollector usage [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve ICollector usage [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve ICollector usage [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Audit use of AtomicInt32 and AtomicInt64 methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Audit use of AtomicInt32 and AtomicInt64 methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene.Net: 4.8 SetNextReader executes repeatedly and returns only one result [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene.Net: 4.8 SetNextReader executes repeatedly and returns only one result [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene.Net: 4.8 SetNextReader executes repeatedly and returns only one result [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene.Net: 4.8 SetNextReader executes repeatedly and returns only one result [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Community Over Code Asia 2024 Travel Assistance Applications now open! Gavin McDonald
• [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core J-S, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages