On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Cagatay Civici > <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I see scannoation in openwebbeans, anyone tried it? As far as I know it's a >> one man project and dont know if he still maintains it. > > ah, so perhaps guice over scannoation ?
oh, I see it's (scannotation) from Bill Burke. and the license is fine (ASL 2) as well. -M > > -M > >> >> I think reflection&.class stuff is problematic if you dont limit the package >> name to be scanned. >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> It might be smart to put this Shale code in a separate project. For >>> >>> example >>> >>> in Commons, since there are several Apache projects that need to scan >>> >>> for >>> >>> annotations, like EJB3 and JPA projects. >>> >>> there is something on the new "open web beans" podling (in the incubator) >>> >>> or, take a look a google guice? I think the startup is pretty fast and >>> the dependency >>> shouldn't really be a show stopper. Guice is ASL2, btw. >>> >>> -M >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Yeah, I thought the same too. >>> >> What would be great would be some sort of "annotation scanner" where >>> >> you can register a "scanning job" for system startup so that the >>> >> classpath >>> >> scanning has to take place only once and the scanning jobs get called >>> >> back >>> >> about the results. >>> >> >>> >> Sure, if a scanning job registers something like "**" all packages get >>> >> scanned and startup time is slow again, but this is on the >>> >> responsibility of >>> >> the developer then. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I can help to startup a commons sandbox project and to work out a >>> >> specification for the library, but my spare time for coding is very low >>> >> :-( >>> >> >>> >> Ciao, >>> >> Mario >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > Mario, I've been looking at the Shale code that handles the annotation >>> > scanning, but I saw it uses Reflection and standard Java ClassLoaders >>> > for scanning the classpath for JSF artifacts. What's your experience >>> > with the performance of this? Does Shale heavily rely on specifying a >>> > base package to be efficient? >>> > >>> > /Jan-Kees >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
