I see scannoation in openwebbeans, anyone tried it? As far as I know it's a one man project and dont know if he still maintains it.
I think reflection&.class stuff is problematic if you dont limit the package name to be scanned. On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>wrote: > >>> It might be smart to put this Shale code in a separate project. For > >>> example > >>> in Commons, since there are several Apache projects that need to scan > >>> for > >>> annotations, like EJB3 and JPA projects. > > there is something on the new "open web beans" podling (in the incubator) > > or, take a look a google guice? I think the startup is pretty fast and > the dependency > shouldn't really be a show stopper. Guice is ASL2, btw. > > -M > >> > >> > >> Yeah, I thought the same too. > >> What would be great would be some sort of "annotation scanner" where you > can register a "scanning job" for system startup so that the classpath > scanning has to take place only once and the scanning jobs get called back > about the results. > >> > >> Sure, if a scanning job registers something like "**" all packages get > scanned and startup time is slow again, but this is on the responsibility of > the developer then. > >> > >> > >> I can help to startup a commons sandbox project and to work out a > specification for the library, but my spare time for coding is very low :-( > >> > >> Ciao, > >> Mario > >> > >> > > > > Mario, I've been looking at the Shale code that handles the annotation > > scanning, but I saw it uses Reflection and standard Java ClassLoaders > > for scanning the classpath for JSF artifacts. What's your experience > > with the performance of this? Does Shale heavily rely on specifying a > > base package to be efficient? > > > > /Jan-Kees > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
