Reviews, test and peers control should be sufficient, but yes it seems in some cases it's not enough, especially when we don't get a good consensus, and then gradually everybody let the things roll

Jacques

Scott Gray wrote:
I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now for 
it is that it would remove control of the framework
from this community.  I'd much rather use a framework that has one good 
architect controlling everything than use something where
poorly thought out code can be dumped with impunity.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 30/04/2011, at 8:54 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

Since we're discussing framework rewrites and free markets and such, I decided 
to throw my hat into the ring too.

One proposal so far is to replace the OFBiz framework with the Moqui project. I 
have another idea - let's rewrite the framework
using the existing community. Everyone can participate in the design - thereby 
leveraging the immense wealth of knowledge
available in the community.

To kick things off, I created a document describing my vision of an application 
framework. It's brief and it doesn't include any
implementation details. If there is any interest in this approach, then 
everyone is free to add pages to the document and we can
go from there.

The document can be found here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Another+Framework+Vision

-Adrian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to