I don't see the things as dark, but yes sometimes there are problems
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
I've long since given up on reviewing any work, I would rarely get any support,
frequently get attacked and almost always come
out with no result.
Regards
Scott
On 3/05/2011, at 9:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Reviews, test and peers control should be sufficient, but yes it seems in some
cases it's not enough, especially when we don't
get a good consensus, and then gradually everybody let the things roll
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now for
it is that it would remove control of the
framework from this community. I'd much rather use a framework that has one
good architect controlling everything than use
something where poorly thought out code can be dumped with impunity.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 30/04/2011, at 8:54 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Since we're discussing framework rewrites and free markets and such, I decided
to throw my hat into the ring too.
One proposal so far is to replace the OFBiz framework with the Moqui project. I
have another idea - let's rewrite the framework
using the existing community. Everyone can participate in the design - thereby
leveraging the immense wealth of knowledge
available in the community.
To kick things off, I created a document describing my vision of an application
framework. It's brief and it doesn't include
any implementation details. If there is any interest in this approach, then
everyone is free to add pages to the document and
we can go from there.
The document can be found here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Another+Framework+Vision
-Adrian
