I've long since given up on reviewing any work, I would rarely get any support, frequently get attacked and almost always come out with no result.
Regards Scott On 3/05/2011, at 9:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Reviews, test and peers control should be sufficient, but yes it seems in > some cases it's not enough, especially when we don't get a good consensus, > and then gradually everybody let the things roll > > Jacques > > Scott Gray wrote: >> I don't know much about Moqui, but the biggest motivator I have right now >> for it is that it would remove control of the framework >> from this community. I'd much rather use a framework that has one good >> architect controlling everything than use something where >> poorly thought out code can be dumped with impunity. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 30/04/2011, at 8:54 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> >>> Since we're discussing framework rewrites and free markets and such, I >>> decided to throw my hat into the ring too. >>> >>> One proposal so far is to replace the OFBiz framework with the Moqui >>> project. I have another idea - let's rewrite the framework >>> using the existing community. Everyone can participate in the design - >>> thereby leveraging the immense wealth of knowledge >>> available in the community. >>> >>> To kick things off, I created a document describing my vision of an >>> application framework. It's brief and it doesn't include any >>> implementation details. If there is any interest in this approach, then >>> everyone is free to add pages to the document and we can >>> go from there. >>> >>> The document can be found here: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Another+Framework+Vision >>> >>> -Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
