Jacques, Yes. You are right. I meant projectmgr. :)
I believe assetmaint and projectmgr are used more than others and good to keep them where they are. Thank you. On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > partymgr is in application will not move, you meant ProjectMgr right? > > Jacques > > From: "Mansour Al Akeel" <mansour.alak...@gmail.com> > >> I would recommend keeping partymgr and assetmaint. >> I am not sure if accounting depends on assetmain. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> + 1 on move of majority of apps in specialpurpose to 'Extras', excluding >>> projectmgr as it displays how to use OFBiz in a different industry than >>> ecommerce/webshop. Is it not so that OFBiz is versatile. ProjectMgr does >>> deliver some of that versatility. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Pierre >>> >>> Op 20 maart 2012 12:47 schreef Jacopo Cappellato < >>> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> het volgende: >>> >>>> > >>>> > H) specialpurpose/*: move several (if not all, apart ecommerce) of the >>>> components to "Extras" (if there are persons interested to become >>>> committers/maintainers) or to "Attic" >>>> > >>>> >>>> There seems to be a general agreement to slim down the number of >>>> applications in this group and move them to Extras (see exceptions >>>> below). >>>> I am summarizing here some notes but we should actually use this thread >>>> to >>>> continue the discussion about what should go to specialpurpose in >>>> general >>>> rather than focusing on the decision about removal of specific >>>> applications; we can then start a separate thread for each component. >>>> >>>> Adrian would like to keep one or two components to demonstrate the >>>> concept >>>> of reusing artifacts to create custom applications (Jacopo: can we use >>>> the >>>> "exampleext" component for this?) >>>> Hans would like to keep the ones that he considers feature complete like >>>> asset maintenance, LDAP, POS, e-commerce, cmssite, projectmgr and scrum. >>>> Jacopo: in my opinion even in the above list provided by Hans there are >>>> applications that are barely examples (cmssite) or are very specific >>>> implementation of very specific requirements (difficult to be used if >>>> your >>>> company doesn't have exactly these requirements): projectmgr and scrum; >>>> some of these components also extends (adding special purpose fields) >>>> the >>>> generic data model and this happens even if the user is not interested >>>> in >>>> evaluating the specialpurpose component. I also don't think that some of >>>> the components meet minimum quality requirements to be distributed with >>>> OFBiz: for example the scrum component uses a mechanism that is unique >>>> to >>>> demo its features (i.e. published a demo webapp with online instructions >>>> for demo data) that is not used by other applications (and this makes >>>> the >>>> suite of applications inconsistent); also, the component refers to >>>> resources that are owned by Hans' company. All in all, they seem very >>>> specific piece of codes that should better live as optional plugins >>>> downloaded separately. So in my opinion the "concept" of specialpurpose >>>> application is in general better suited for Apache Extras rather than >>>> for >>>> the OFBiz svn and releases. >>>> >>>> >>>> >
