Bernd Eilers wrote: > Note that everywhere where there is a "feature-info:" in the "Spec. > abstract" column of the Release Notes the process used a dirty fallback > to use information from the feature announcement mail instead of using > information from the specification because either a specification was > not available at all or was not usable because it was not conform to one > of the specification templates. Why is that fallback "dirty"? I don't think that everything mentioned in the release notes needs a full blown specification. As Thorsten Ziehm mentioned on GullFOSS today feature mails are what makes features and enhancements known and they should be the primary source of information and any automatic process collecting "what's new" in a release should start there. In case the mail contained a link to a specification it should perhaps be used instead to avoid duplicating information already in the spec. So I would like to see the spec being the fallback. And it's also not dirty. ;-)
Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
