Alex, no body is making this a personal attack. Just pointing that maybe both are doing things wrong.
In the other hand you know that no breaking build does not mean that we are not breaking things. If I remove code in some UIBase setter, I can make all Royale apps fail without breaking the build right?. The problem here is the same but with IDEs. We all have to accept others people warnings and problems and don't think our commits are infallible. I think Dave suggestion is the way to go. We can go to a branch and revert my commit so we can try how to get both things working. And again, we all know how emails works in making things removing the human touch, so don't think that I'm making any personal attack since is not my intention. And if I do in some way, just accept my apologies for that. I'll create the branch today as I have time and revert the change so we can progress with this issue thanks! Carlos El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 8:34, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) escribió: > > > On 11/26/18, 10:42 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > (1) Maybe you should be on a branch too! > > (2) Merges happen when everyone is ready! > > Now discuss development branches > > > We have. We use them when we judge them necessary for big disruptive > changes. I didn't and still don't think it was necessary. The builds and > tests and examples passed. > > If you are supporting reverting other people's commits, personal attacks, > and committing changes without justification, then I am really surprised > and disappointed. I would think we would want less of that, not more. > > My 2 cents, > -Alex > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
