As discussed I changed royale-config.xml to list all of our SWCs except for
MXRoyale and SparkRoyale, and changed flex-config.xml to use all SWCs and have
different default classes such as mx.events.MouseEvent instead of
org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent. I think Carlos has the only project using
MXRoyale and Jewel and maybe some Basic so neither config is set up exactly for
his needs. Since all configuration is theoretically overridable as compiler
options, he should have been able to get going by specifying what SWCs he wants
to use.
He said he wasn't able to do that, so he committed a change that went back to
using a wildcard in royale-config.xml and thus pull in all SWCs and
re-introduce the problem. That doesn't make any technical sense to me and
brought back the CSS problem that was affecting folks like you. So I asked him
to revert his wildcard change and so far, he hasn't and instead he started in
on how I am seeking special treatment.
-Alex
On 11/28/18, 7:19 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
I’m still not following.
What did you change and what was the issue that Carlos hit? Am I correct
that you were fixing the problem that MXRoyale was overriding the Basic CSS?
What exactly was the fix and why was it causing problems?
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 5:21 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Carlos reverted a commit I made without technical justification and
refuses to put back my changes when I asked, instead saying I was acting like I
should have special treatment. Apparently, Carlos couldn't compile his app
even though all of our examples build just fine. I've tried to help, but
cannot get solid data from Carlos.
>
> Somehow Dave Fisher thinks is ok for Carlos to act like that. I think it
sets a dangerous precedent to have committers revert other people's changes
without technical justification, and also a bad precedent to allow people to
basically call people names when they disagree about something.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/27/18, 4:52 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have not been following the list very well the last week plus. (I’ve
been busy with some personal things.)
>
> I’m not following the issues here. What was changed, and what’s the
issue here?
>
