As discussed I changed royale-config.xml to list all of our SWCs except for MXRoyale and SparkRoyale, and changed flex-config.xml to use all SWCs and have different default classes such as mx.events.MouseEvent instead of org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent. I think Carlos has the only project using MXRoyale and Jewel and maybe some Basic so neither config is set up exactly for his needs. Since all configuration is theoretically overridable as compiler options, he should have been able to get going by specifying what SWCs he wants to use.
He said he wasn't able to do that, so he committed a change that went back to using a wildcard in royale-config.xml and thus pull in all SWCs and re-introduce the problem. That doesn't make any technical sense to me and brought back the CSS problem that was affecting folks like you. So I asked him to revert his wildcard change and so far, he hasn't and instead he started in on how I am seeking special treatment. -Alex On 11/28/18, 7:19 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote: I’m still not following. What did you change and what was the issue that Carlos hit? Am I correct that you were fixing the problem that MXRoyale was overriding the Basic CSS? What exactly was the fix and why was it causing problems? > On Nov 28, 2018, at 5:21 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > Carlos reverted a commit I made without technical justification and refuses to put back my changes when I asked, instead saying I was acting like I should have special treatment. Apparently, Carlos couldn't compile his app even though all of our examples build just fine. I've tried to help, but cannot get solid data from Carlos. > > Somehow Dave Fisher thinks is ok for Carlos to act like that. I think it sets a dangerous precedent to have committers revert other people's changes without technical justification, and also a bad precedent to allow people to basically call people names when they disagree about something. > > -Alex > > On 11/27/18, 4:52 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have not been following the list very well the last week plus. (I’ve been busy with some personal things.) > > I’m not following the issues here. What was changed, and what’s the issue here? >
