Carlos,

What is written below is not really useful data, just a story.  It is really 
hard for me to guess what is going on.  You didn't indicate or show output that 
proves that whatever configs you are trying to use actually got used.  Nor is 
there any indication that you proceeded with any suggestions I have made so 
far.  You could have typed something incorrectly, used the wrong compiler 
option, etc.  I have no idea of what errors were output for what source.  There 
are too many possibilities.

I thought of another approach for you to try:  Because you are not using 
MXRoyale UI widgets, I think you don't want configname=flex as it will pick 
defaults for Flex that you don't want, so remove that and make sure that 
royale-config is being used and has the list of SWCs as I committed it, instead 
of the wildcard/folder you committed.

In theory, that royale-config should list every SWC except MXRoyale and 
SparkRoyale.  Instead of using a folder, you should be able to add those two 
SWCs using -library-path+=<path to>/MXRoyale.swc and -library-path+=<path 
to>/SparkRoyale.swc, and similarly, -js-library-path+=<path to>/MXRoyaleJS.swc 
and -js-library-path+=<path to>/SparkRoyaleJS.swc

IOW, since royale-config used to work for you, and the only change should have 
been to unlist MXRoyale and SparkRoyale, it should be the least effort to 
re-list those two SWCs.  Try that, and report actual data like some console 
output, and the source associated with any errors.

-Alex

On 11/27/18, 8:11 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    just created a branch "feature//config-name-changes" that starts with the
    revert of my commit
    
    What I tried and didn't work is to :
    
    1.- duplicate royale-config-template.xml
    2.- Add "MXRoyale.swc" to both libs list (for SWF and for JS)
    3.- Add a namespace entry for MXRoyale to namespaces
    
    I think that should work out of the box, but listing concrete SWCs make
    IDEs fail
    
    thanks
    
    
    
    
    El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 10:50, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected]>)
    escribió:
    
    > Alex,
    >
    > no body is making this a personal attack. Just pointing that maybe both
    > are doing things wrong.
    >
    > In the other hand you know that no breaking build does not mean that we
    > are not breaking things. If I remove code in some UIBase setter, I  can
    > make all Royale apps fail without breaking the build right?. The problem
    > here is the same but with IDEs.
    >
    > We all have to accept others people warnings and problems and don't think
    > our commits are infallible.
    >
    > I think Dave suggestion is the way to go. We can go to a branch and revert
    > my commit so we can try how to get both things working.
    >
    > And again, we all know how emails works in making things removing the
    > human touch, so don't think that I'm making any personal attack since is
    > not my intention. And if I do in some way, just accept my apologies for
    > that.
    >
    > I'll create the branch today as I have time and revert the change so we
    > can progress with this issue
    >
    > thanks!
    >
    > Carlos
    >
    >
    >
    > El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 8:34, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
    > escribió:
    >
    >>
    >>
    >> On 11/26/18, 10:42 PM, "Dave Fisher" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>     (1) Maybe you should be on a branch too!
    >>
    >>     (2) Merges happen when everyone is ready!
    >>
    >>     Now discuss development branches
    >>
    >>
    >> We have.  We use them when we judge them necessary for big disruptive
    >> changes.  I didn't and still don't think it was necessary.  The builds 
and
    >> tests and examples passed.
    >>
    >> If you are supporting reverting other people's commits, personal attacks,
    >> and committing changes without justification, then I am really surprised
    >> and disappointed.  I would think we would want less of that, not more.
    >>
    >> My 2 cents,
    >> -Alex
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    > --
    > Carlos Rovira
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8426b5aa23034aafe1ad08d65482ee74%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636789318655224607&amp;sdata=lr0by7FhNCN%2FyBvvMs%2FR%2BzGNvn6634kyQMhlGqX7uxE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8426b5aa23034aafe1ad08d65482ee74%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636789318655224607&amp;sdata=lr0by7FhNCN%2FyBvvMs%2FR%2BzGNvn6634kyQMhlGqX7uxE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    

Reply via email to