Hi,

just created a branch "feature//config-name-changes" that starts with the
revert of my commit

What I tried and didn't work is to :

1.- duplicate royale-config-template.xml
2.- Add "MXRoyale.swc" to both libs list (for SWF and for JS)
3.- Add a namespace entry for MXRoyale to namespaces

I think that should work out of the box, but listing concrete SWCs make
IDEs fail

thanks




El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 10:50, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrov...@apache.org>)
escribió:

> Alex,
>
> no body is making this a personal attack. Just pointing that maybe both
> are doing things wrong.
>
> In the other hand you know that no breaking build does not mean that we
> are not breaking things. If I remove code in some UIBase setter, I  can
> make all Royale apps fail without breaking the build right?. The problem
> here is the same but with IDEs.
>
> We all have to accept others people warnings and problems and don't think
> our commits are infallible.
>
> I think Dave suggestion is the way to go. We can go to a branch and revert
> my commit so we can try how to get both things working.
>
> And again, we all know how emails works in making things removing the
> human touch, so don't think that I'm making any personal attack since is
> not my intention. And if I do in some way, just accept my apologies for
> that.
>
> I'll create the branch today as I have time and revert the change so we
> can progress with this issue
>
> thanks!
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 8:34, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/26/18, 10:42 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>     (1) Maybe you should be on a branch too!
>>
>>     (2) Merges happen when everyone is ready!
>>
>>     Now discuss development branches
>>
>>
>> We have.  We use them when we judge them necessary for big disruptive
>> changes.  I didn't and still don't think it was necessary.  The builds and
>> tests and examples passed.
>>
>> If you are supporting reverting other people's commits, personal attacks,
>> and committing changes without justification, then I am really surprised
>> and disappointed.  I would think we would want less of that, not more.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to