Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. But really I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a patch release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug. It wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just helping someone fix their problem.
BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr 9.5, so maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index format BTW. ~ David On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid> wrote: > On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > > I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would prefer to > > do 9.5. What do people think? > > The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for > 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > > I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the author > thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > > I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that gets its > index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given me any > trouble. > > I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >
