Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr post command.
Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url parameter. I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c parameter, and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense > there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts! > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? >> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary >> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" only >> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding? >> >> Jan >> >>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new Python >> and >>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release, or >>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new >>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd hate to >>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to crop >> up. >>> >>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe? >>> >>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the way >> of >>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even >> with >>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a willing >> RM >>> for 9.4.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown >>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much easier >>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. >>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always room >>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we don't >>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my >> mind it >>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 months >> has >>>> passed. >>>> >>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I >>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. But >>>> really >>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a patch >>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug. It >>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just helping >>>>> someone fix their problem. >>>>> >>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr >> 9.5, >>>> so >>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index >>>> format >>>>> BTW. >>>>> >>>>> ~ David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey >> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: >>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would >> prefer >>>> to >>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? >>>>>> >>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for >>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the >> author >>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. >>>>>> >>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that gets >> its >>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given me >> any >>>>>> trouble. >>>>>> >>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Shawn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
