I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of known
CVEs down.
I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but unfortunately
Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
> Run cd
> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
Jan
> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>
> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as
> there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> ~ David
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr post
>> command.
>>
>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech
>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url parameter.
>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c parameter,
>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
>>
>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense
>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary
>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal"
>> only
>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new Python
>>>> and
>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release,
>> or
>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new
>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd hate
>> to
>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to
>> crop
>>>> up.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe?
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the way
>>>> of
>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even
>>>> with
>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a willing
>>>> RM
>>>>> for 9.4.1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown
>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much easier
>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users.
>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always
>> room
>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we
>> don't
>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my
>>>> mind it
>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2
>> months
>>>> has
>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I
>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. But
>>>>>> really
>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a
>> patch
>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug.
>> It
>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just
>> helping
>>>>>>> someone fix their problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr
>>>> 9.5,
>>>>>> so
>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index
>>>>>> format
>>>>>>> BTW.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~ David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey
>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would
>>>> prefer
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for
>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the
>>>> author
>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that gets
>>>> its
>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given me
>>>> any
>>>>>>>> trouble.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________
>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>>
>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
>> whether attachments are marked as such.
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
