Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense
there.  Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts!

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary
> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" only
> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding?
>
> Jan
>
> > 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new Python
> and
> > Javascript clients in front of users.  I'm willing to RM the release, or
> > share duties with you if you're interested David?  Publishing the new
> > clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd hate to
> > saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to crop
> up.
> >
> > What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe?
> >
> > That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the way
> of
> > that either.  Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even
> with
> > a 9.5.  I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a willing
> RM
> > for 9.4.1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown
> >> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much easier
> >> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users.
> >> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always room
> >> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we don't
> >> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my
> mind it
> >> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 months
> has
> >> passed.
> >>
> >> I can help backport dependency upgrades.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I
> >>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are.  But
> >> really
> >>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a patch
> >>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug.  It
> >>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just helping
> >>> someone fix their problem.
> >>>
> >>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr
> 9.5,
> >> so
> >>> maybe we do this 9.4.1.  That Lucene release also touches the index
> >> format
> >>> BTW.
> >>>
> >>> ~ David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey
> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote:
> >>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option.  If it still is, I would
> prefer
> >> to
> >>>>> do 9.5.  What do people think?
> >>>>
> >>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for
> >>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either.
> >>>>
> >>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the
> author
> >>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer.
> >>>>
> >>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that gets
> its
> >>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently.  It hasn't given me
> any
> >>>> trouble.
> >>>>
> >>>> I say go for it.  Someday I will do a release myself.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Shawn
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to