Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as there are a couple security matters we're looking at. ~ David
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr post > command. > > Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech > products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url parameter. > I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c parameter, > and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. > > This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > > > On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense > > there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts! > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > > > >> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > >> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary > >> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" > only > >> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding? > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new Python > >> and > >>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release, > or > >>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new > >>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd hate > to > >>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to > crop > >> up. > >>> > >>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe? > >>> > >>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the way > >> of > >>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even > >> with > >>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a willing > >> RM > >>> for 9.4.1 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown > >>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much easier > >>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. > >>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always > room > >>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we > don't > >>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my > >> mind it > >>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 > months > >> has > >>>> passed. > >>>> > >>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >: > >>>>> > >>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I > >>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. But > >>>> really > >>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a > patch > >>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug. > It > >>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just > helping > >>>>> someone fix their problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr > >> 9.5, > >>>> so > >>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index > >>>> format > >>>>> BTW. > >>>>> > >>>>> ~ David > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey > >> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid > >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > >>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would > >> prefer > >>>> to > >>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for > >>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the > >> author > >>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that gets > >> its > >>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given me > >> any > >>>>>> trouble. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Shawn > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > >> > > _______________________ > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > >
