Re: [OT] Re: Should I announce SmartURLs or wait?

[Brian Pontarelli]

I'd like to solidify a package names. One of the headaches we experienced was the conversion between the two versions of zero-conf/code-behind because of the package names. I'm fine with moving my packages around into the struts namespace, but if you guys decide to add these annotations for 2.0.x I think they should be put into their final package so to speak and fix everything to use those package names.

-bp


Ted Husted wrote:

I was just wondering if it would make any sense to at least add
SmartURL-type ActionName and ActionNames annotations to the 2.0.x
core, so as to finish what we started with the validation and result
annotations. We probably don't need to get into exception and
interceptor annotations for 2.0, but ActionNames would be nice.

-Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature