I'd prefer we give this more thought and keep it in the 2.1.x branch. I view patch releases as those that only provide bug fixes or minor stability features. Something like annotations, which will be used in client code, is really a public API feature and should be reserved for minor, at the least, feature releases.
Don On 9/18/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering if it would make any sense to at least add > SmartURL-type ActionName and ActionNames annotations to the 2.0.x > core, so as to finish what we started with the validation and result > annotations. We probably don't need to get into exception and > interceptor annotations for 2.0, but ActionNames would be nice. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
