Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015, 18:33:15 schrieb Florent Daigniere: > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 14:22 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > I think it's time for us all to take a step back and have a serious > > conversation about where we are, and where we are going. > > > > Sounds good. So let's sum it up: > > Yesterday we thought we were in a world where we didn't need Freenet > and where we couldn't possibly face a passive global adversary. > > Today we know that we need Freenet more than ever... and that we face > at least one active, global adversary. > > Is "pretending that Opennet can work" still the official project's > line?
I’ve been saying for quite some time “Opennet is what we need to make it possible for users to join, Darknet is where we want them as soon as possible”. And I did not hear anyone argumenting against that. Not in the past year. I’m actively using Darknet features so I see where they suck. Node-to-Node messages are pretty cool, but plagued by usability issues. And the one thing we need to spread Darknet has been living in plan-land for years: Darknet invites which connect automatically (via one-time tokens). I want to be able to give every one of my friends a USB stick with a Freenet installer which auto-connects to my Freenet node or my friends. We have everything needed for that — except for the actually important code (one-time tokens + FOAF-connecting). Though, to stop the complaining, I didn’t manage to do that myself either. I have sufficient skills for that nowadays, just the free creative time is missing. Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
