On 10/16/15 20:09, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:09 +1000, dean wrote: >>> Is "pretending that Opennet can work" still the official project's >>> line? >> >> In regards to this I must protest. I don't have any cyberpunk friends >> :( > > Protest all you want; it's useless unless you come up with solutions. > > If the aim of the project is to protect (Chinese, ...) dissidents we > have to account for their threat model.
Why cant freenet have more than one aim? Darknet for the more extreme threats? > As far as I know it has to include state level actors... Given that, I don't > know how to make any > form of opennet securely work for them. Do you? No I do not, I'm certainly not an expert in this area. I was hoping the experts were working for the freenet project.... I always liked the idea of wireless mesh routing like freedom box claim (i have not tried this) could assist against state level threats or some sort of dead drop system or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PirateBox might come in handy when the adversary owns infrastructure. Maybe I need to research this topic more but I don't understand how just darknet can operate on its own. What happens when all you get is many small isolated darknets who cannot share with each other? Datastore sneakernet? Isn't half the point of opennet to connect various darknets together? and assist the darknet users to "get their message out"? or else what is the point of them publishing anything? Or even better, maybe I just need to make some new friends? Dean.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
