Gary, >From the ARRL website: Novice and Technician classes:
28.000-28.300 MHz: CW, RTTY/Data--Maximum power 200 watts PEP 28.300-28.500 MHz: CW, Phone--Maximum power 200 watts PEP http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/allocate.html#10 <http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/allocate.html#10> Personally, I do not particularly encourage Techs to use digital modes on 10m, and would strongly oppose opening any other Novice/Tech CW sub bands to digital mode use by Techs. Band plans are already in a state of chaos and this would probably render those "novice" areas nearly useless. It would be a free for all the way I see it. It is sufficiently complex that I see plenty of Generals & Extras have a hard time using digital modes appropriately. Don't get me wrong, I love digital modes and welcome their responsible use- but if it cannot be done at least as orderly as now then we had best not open the gates to a herd of exuberant greenhorns without sufficient coaching. There are still three license classes for a reason! Now if you propose that local clubs or even via online that some classes be put together to coach Techs into upgrading to General with a focus on setting up & using digital modes (or for that matter CW) I'd be all for that! The biggest obstacles keeping people from upgrading is the lack of readily available elmering and the persistent attitude of the crusty OF's who think they own HF. Has been that way for the 20 years I've been licensed at least. Stu AF6IT --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Gary" <grwes...@...> wrote: > > I thought I'd run something up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes: <snip> > So... Here is the idea. Would you be amenable to allowing Technician Class licensees to operate digital modes in the Technician CW bands and do you think that would be of interest to new hams? > > I would imagine, the license limitations would have to state something like a maximum of 300 baud and 500 Hz bandwidth with a 200 watt power limit. There may be other limitations that might be nice to toss into the mix but this is a starting point for discussion. > > Your thoughts? > > Gary - N0GW >