On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Robert L Mathews wrote: > Even if Tucows doesn't care that associating with Constant Contact is roughly > the Internet equivalent of associating with known mob figures, you'd think > they'd care about the fact that anyone who uses Constant Contact for > legitimate mail is likely to be disappointed by the fact that a huge > percentage of the mail is blocked by receiving ISPs. People who innocently > sign up for it will find it's a shoddy product.
Interestingly, this came up on SPAM-L yesterday because someone received a notice from a list they were on that it was moving to Constant Contact, and based on the text below wanted to know if CC was really white-hat. > -/snip/- > Our messages should arrive more reliably. In the past many of you have > complained that you did not receive the articles you requested. Often > this was due to our messages being mistaken for unsolicited email by > the spam filters of Internet service providers. By sending our > messages through Constant Contact, our email should now appear on the > "white lists" of all major Internet service providers, bypassing spam > filters which have sometimes mistaken our messages for unsolicited > advertising. > -/snip/- Though many have said CC is blocked, I've yet to hear from one place they were whitelisted (and SPAM-L has reps from some of the big guys, including pobox, aol, rr). As someone on the list pointed out "They start out by lying, so why would you trust them ?" ========================================================== Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/ _______________________________________________ domains-gen mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
