Glad you're going to give it a rest.....

N5GE

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Wes Stewart <n...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I'm not picking on Paul, this is just a handy place to reply. I'm going to say 
>this one more time (the first time was two years ago).
>
>I really don't understand all of the fuss about 1 Hz accuracy when just 
>changing the K3 Width and Shift controls moves the frequency more than that 
>and this is band dependent.
>
>On ten-meters I can listen to a crystal-controlled source and hear the beat 
>note change as Shift and Width are adjusted.
>
>Elecraft considers its frequency conversion scheme to be proprietary but it's 
>obvious that not all of the oscillators are moving at the same rate. 
>
>Wes  N7WS
>
>--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Paul Christensen <w...@arrl.net> wrote:
>
>> I installed it on Friday in about 30
>> minutes, but I'm comfortable with my 
>> way around the K3.  I would think that most users
>> could install it in about 
>> an hour or less.  Installation is actually very simple
>> with very few parts 
>> involved.  K3EXREF came with an SMA connector and SMA
>> to BNC between-series 
>> adapter.
>> 
>> Performance is exactly as promised by Elecraft. 
>> Although K3EXREF will not 
>> phase lock the K3 to the external frequency source, I'm
>> finding that it 
>> stays within 1 Hz on 20m when locked to CHU at 14.670
>> MHz.   I'm also 
>> finding that testing for zero-beat to WWV at 10 MHz is not
>> a good idea in my 
>> shack, and perhaps yours too.  There are many 10 MHz
>> signals being emitted 
>> by nearby appliances, LAN routers, security system,
>> Ethernet boards, etc. 
>> That common, even frequency is everywhere in a household
>> these days.
>> 
>> In much of North America, CHU is an excellent source for
>> testing since it 
>> keeps cesium accuracy like WWV but the odd frequency of CHU
>> is a real 
>> benefit since the chance for beating against extraneous
>> signals is much 
>> smaller than at 10 MHz.  Testing at a higher frequency
>> rather than say the 
>> MW broadcast band also provides for a reasonably good
>> account of how the 
>> K3EXREF performs.   After installation, I
>> would also suggest not trying to 
>> test zero beat K3EXREF against commercial MW or SW BC
>> stations since their 
>> carriers are allowed to deviate much more than the
>> cesium-based time and 
>> frequency standards of CHU and WWV.  Commercial AM
>> broadcast station 
>> frequencies are typically only accurate to about +/- 20 Hz
>> although most are 
>> better than that.
>> 
>> The K3's 49 MHz oscillator is only adjusted at intervals
>> between 4 and 8 
>> seconds by K3EXREF in order to minimize jitter.  The
>> K3 retains its original 
>> phase noise performance since the external reference is not
>> used internal to 
>> the K3's frequency generating scheme.  Think of it
>> this way -- K3EXREF is 
>> like lightly touching the 49 MHz oscillator with a feather
>> every few seconds 
>> if necessary to keep it within 1 Hz or so.  Also, the
>> K3 frequency stays 
>> accurate even at the moment of powering up the K3. 
>> Kinda' fun to watch the 
>> 49 MHz oscillator display change during warm-up as it's
>> being corrected and 
>> compared against the external reference.
>> 
>> External references:  There are three primary types,
>> and all can be 
>> purchased for less than USD $150 on the used market. 
>> Cesium standards (a 
>> fourth type) are also available but are generally much more
>> expensive, 
>> complicated, and won't offer any benefit to K3 users since
>> K3EXREF limits 
>> resolution and accuracy to about 1 Hz.
>> 
>> The first type is the GPS Disciplined Oscillator
>> (GPS-DO).   This type of 
>> standard locks itself onto the visible GPS satellites
>> orbiting the sky. 
>> Requires a GPS antenna and is self-calibrating to the GPS
>> satellites.  The 
>> GPS-DO's time and frequency averages from the visible
>> satellites, each 
>> satellite having it's own on-board cesium-based
>> oscillator.  Long-term 
>> accuracy is usually good to at least 1 x 10^-11. 
>> Extreme accuracy and only 
>> a magnitude or two behind cesium.  Look for
>> Hewlett-Packard Z3801A, Z3816A, 
>> Trimble Thunderbolt, Brandywine, Symmetricon, and Datum
>> models.  Short list, 
>> but many others available.
>> 
>> Rubidium is the next type.  No GPS tracking
>> needed.  Accuracy commensurate 
>> with GPS-DO.  No antenna required.  Long-term
>> performance is highly 
>> dependent on the quality of the optical beam from the
>> rubidium pump lamp. 
>> Look for EF Efratom, Datum,
>> 
>> Third, is a high quality oven-controlled crystal oscillator
>> (OCXO). 
>> Requires periodic calibration.  Accuracy good to at
>> least +/- 0.05 ppm and 
>> offer the best phase noise performance among the three
>> types of oscillators, 
>> but as noted earlier, the excellent phase noise attributes
>> of the OCXO will 
>> not be carried over to the K3.
>> 
>> A shack reference oscillator is good for use with other
>> equipment too (e.g., 
>> frequency counter).   Although a bit lossy,
>> I currectly use a Mini-Circuits 
>> passive three-way splitter, but one can purchase a
>> distribution amp to feed 
>> many pieces of equipment from a single oscillator. 
>> Unlike the splitter, a 
>> DA offers unity gain and very high port isolation.
>> 
>> Finally, be mindful that most GPS-DO and rubidium units use
>> internal 
>> switch-mode DC-DC converters.  Switching noise was bad
>> enough on two of my 
>> units that I decided to gut the converters and used an
>> outboard 
>> triple-output linear supply.  The Trimble Thunderbolts
>> that have been 
>> retired from the cellular industry require an external
>> triple-output supply. 
>> If choosing this model, get a linear type and avoid the
>> headaches.
>> 
>> Paul, W9AC 
>> 
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to