Messages by Date
-
2000/10/20
Re: [EM] Discover Magazine article
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/19
Re: [EM] Discover Magazine article
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/19
Re: [EM] Discover Magazine article
Rob Lanphier
-
2000/10/19
[EM] Discover Magazine article
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/19
RE: A 27 character J program to elect winners
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/19
[EM] A 27 character J program to elect winners
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/19
[EM] New ElectionReform Wiki
Rob Lanphier
-
2000/10/18
RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/18
RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/18
[EM] STV is nonmontonic 24% of vote negated
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/18
[EM] Carnahan Will Remain On Ballot
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/17
RE: [EM] RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/16
[EM] U.S. Gerrymander System- 2000 Census Version
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/16
[EM] Fair Vote Canada postings (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/16
[EM] RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/16
[EM] Oregon First To Use Mail-In Ballot
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/15
RE: [EM] Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/15
[EM] New STV mailing list has appeared!
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/15
[EM] Lowest YES p.r. elimination method
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/14
[EM] Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/12
[EM] Arrow in one sentence.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/12
Re: [EM] Craig's question
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/11
RE: Craig's question
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/11
[EM] Place Votes and Sets in p.r. elections
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/11
[EM] Craig's question
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/11
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/11
Re: [EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/11
RE: Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/11
RE: Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/11
RE: [EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/11
RE: About Arrow's theorem
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/11
[EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/11
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/10
[EM] ICANN elections held using IRV
Rob Lanphier
-
2000/10/10
RE: [EM] Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/10
[EM] Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/10
RE: [EM]
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/10
[EM]
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/10
[EM] About Arrow's theorem
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/10
Re: [EM] Janets questions
JanetRAnderson
-
2000/10/10
Re: [EM] Janets questions
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/10
[EM] Mike: Proof using GSFC & SDSC re-requested, new false claim occurred
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/10
[EM] Biasing STV for women: not a possibility. Ireland transfer values in European Parliament elections
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/09
[EM] IRV, SFC, WDSC examples
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/09
[EM] This installment wasn't sent
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/09
Re: [EM] Janets questions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/09
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/09
[EM] The 3 Matrices
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/09
Re: [EM] Janets questions
JanetRAnderson
-
2000/10/09
[EM] Mr O.: GSFC+SDSC pass for 'Tideman(wv)': the proof requested
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/09
[EM] CVD IRV elections halve and negate voters' votes.
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/09
[EM] CVD PDF brochure says IRV is "constitutional"
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/09
[EM] ICCPR Article 25(b) violations of Washington Citizens for Proportional Representation
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM] Majorities (was Re: Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM] Blake Cretney: Can you prove this?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/08
[EM] Part 3--What's wrong with IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
[EM] Part 2--What's wrong with IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
[EM] Janet: What's wrong with IRV (or some of it ).
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/08
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/08
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/08
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
RJ Vein
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM]
JanetRAnderson
-
2000/10/08
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/08
[EM] Blake Cretney: Can you prove this?
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/07
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/07
[EM] Papers are voters: asserting aspects of voters
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/07
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/07
[EM] Majorities (was Re: Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC)
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/07
Re: [EM] Losing with 99% of the vote: Mike tell us why
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/07
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/07
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/07
[EM] Losing with 99% of the vote: Mike tell us why
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/06
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/06
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
[EM] typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/06
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/06
Re: FW: [EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/06
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/06
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/05
Re: [EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/05
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/05
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/05
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/05
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/05
FW: [EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/05
Re: [EM] please remove from list
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
Re: [EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
[EM] please remove from list
J Bravo
-
2000/10/05
[EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
[EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/05
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
[EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/05
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/05
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/05
Re: [EM] 4W1CD problem: correction
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/04
Re: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/04
Re: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/04
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/04
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/04
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/04
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/04
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/04
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/04
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/04
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/04
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/04
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/04
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/03
RE: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/03
Re: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/03
Re: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/03
Re: [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/03
[EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
2000/10/03
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/03
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/03
[EM] Internet voting meeting (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/03
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/03
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/03
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/03
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleadingwebsite
Bart Ingles
-
2000/10/02
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/02
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/02
[EM] The 6 paper 4W1CD problem solved.
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/02
[EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/02
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/01
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
2000/10/01
Re: [EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.
David Catchpole
-
2000/10/01
[EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/01
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/10/01
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/01
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
2000/10/01
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
2000/10/01
[EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
2000/09/26
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/26
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/25
[EM] Markus: Tideman(m) & Condorcet Criterion
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/24
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/24
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/23
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/23
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/21
[EM] Comments on a bizarre request.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/21
[EM] Re: Minimizing need for insincerity
DEMOREP1
-
2000/09/20
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
Bart Ingles
-
2000/09/20
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/20
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/19
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/19
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/19
[EM] Justification of my example definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/19
Re: Minimizing need for insincerity
DEMOREP1
-
2000/09/19
Re: [EM] 3 questions for Markus
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/19
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
Blake Cretney
-
2000/09/18
[EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/18
[EM] unspecified conditions are optional
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/18
[EM] unspecified conditions are optional
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/17
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/17
[EM] A simple goodbye to Markus' objection.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/17
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/16
[EM] Reply to Demorep. Ambiguity issues.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/16
[EM] Re: SARC definition improvement
DEMOREP1
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/16
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
Bart Ingles
-
2000/09/15
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/15
Re: [EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
Blake Cretney
-
2000/09/15
[EM] Re: Problems with finding the probable best governor
Blake Cretney
-
2000/09/14
[EM] Mikes rules are dumb?, sure, but not quoted in defence too (22KB)
Craig Carey
-
2000/09/14
[EM] Markus' error: What "B" means.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/14
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/14
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
Markus Schulze
-
2000/09/13
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/13
RE: Example's dual has 2 of 3 candidates over -1/3 quota
DEMOREP1
-
2000/09/13
[EM] Example's dual has 2 of 3 candidates over -1/3 quota
Craig Carey
-
2000/09/13
Re: Request for sincerity formulae and 2 sincerity numbers; SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2000/09/13
Re: Request for sincerity formulae and 2 sincerity numbers; SDSC
DEMOREP1
-
2000/09/13
Re: [EM] Request for sincerity formulae and 2 sincerity numbers; SDSC
Craig Carey
-
2000/09/13
Re: [EM] SARC definition improvement
Markus Schulze
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]