election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Request re. Acronym Use on this list Kathy Dopp
  • Re: [EM] Request re. Acronym Use on this list robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Request re. Acronym Use on this list Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Request re. Acronym Use on this list Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] IRV, JITW, Asset, optional delegation. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Listening, and answering people's points of view Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "Fobes" was accidental posting while combining two Fobes posts for comparison and comment.. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Resonance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Resonance robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Resonance Richard Fobes
• [EM] How we can get a better voting system. Injured innocence. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] F922 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot" Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot" Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot" Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot" Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot" robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Jameson: How we can get voting-system reform Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: How we can get voting-system reform Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: How we can get voting-system reform Richard Fobes
• [EM] Jameson: How will voting system reform happen? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: How will voting system reform happen? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Lomax: IRV, Bucklin, TTR Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Lomax: IRV, Bucklin, TTR Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Robert: Condorcet, IRV, Approval, Score Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Jameson: MJ, optimal voting, Strong IIAC Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Steve Eppley's Just-In-Time Withdrawal (JITW) Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Steve Eppley's Just-In-Time Withdrawal (JITW) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Steve Eppley's Just-In-Time Withdrawal (JITW) Raph Frank
• Re: [EM] The usable interpretation of Jameson's proposed Strong IIAC Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] The usable interpretation of Jameson's proposed Strong IIAC Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] The usable interpretation of Jameson's proposed Strong IIAC Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Comment on MJ discussion (Jameson Reply) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Comment on MJ discussion (Jameson Reply) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Comments on MJ discussion (IIAC) Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Comments on MJ discussion Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Comments on MJ discussion Andy Jennings
• [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Greg Nisbet
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Greg Nisbet
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods Greg Nisbet
• [EM] Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6984] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6985] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6984] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6984] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6984] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #6990] Re: Wow: new, simple Bucklin motivation for CMJ. So renaming to Graduated MJ. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] Comment on MJ discussion Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Comment on MJ discussion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Comment on MJ discussion robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Comment on MJ discussion Andy Jennings
• [EM] Independents in Approval and Score-Voting Primaries ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Jonathan Denn
  • Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 103, Issue 1 Andy Jennings
  • [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Clean Government Alliance Richard Fobes
• [EM] A nicer statement of CMJ Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Experimental data on chicken dilemma (post 1 of N: Forsythe 1996) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Experimental data on chicken dilemma (post 1 of N: Forsythe 1996) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Symmetrical-IC-Beatpath(lv)? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical-IC-Beatpath(lv)? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Symmetrical-IC-Beatpath(lv)? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Testing solution to faulty line wrap rendering - no real content Peter Gustafsson
  • [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Proposed bullet-voting prohibition criterion Juho Laatu
• [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Ross Hyman
  • [EM] Israeli election results posted with vote totals and percentages Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] Israeli election results posted with vote totals and percentages Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] clone independent modification of Baldwin Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] clone independent modification of Baldwin Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] clone independent modification of Baldwin Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] clone independent modification of Baldwin Ross Hyman
  • [EM] a plethora of elimination rules that are cloneproof and condorcet Ross Hyman
  • [EM] STV method based on previously introduced clone-proof Condorcet single winner method Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] STV method based on previously introduced clone-proof Condorcet single winner method Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] STV method based on previously introduced clone-proof Condorcet single winner method Ross Hyman
  • [EM] Sequential STV method Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] Sequential STV method Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] Sequential STV method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sequential STV method (Oops) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sequential STV method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sequential STV method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Clone properties for proportional representation Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] Clone properties for proportional representation Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] an entropy formula for the effective number of parties Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] An hypothetical voting system based on Score-Voting and Majority-Judgement which I do not advocate. ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] An hypothetical voting system based on Score-Voting and Majority-Judgement which I do not advocate. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An hypothetical voting system based on Score-Voting and Majority-Judgement which I do not advocate. ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] An hypothetical voting system based on Score-Voting and Majority-Judgement which I do not advocate. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Only a thought-Experiment. (Was: Re: Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges.) ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] Top 6, Top 2, Head to Head Primary Don Hoffard
  • Re: [EM] Top 6, Top 2, Head to Head Primary Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabeticalscales versus numerical ranges. James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement using adjectives versus alphabetical scales versus numerical ranges. Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Advocacy. Compromise. Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Gerrymandering Jonathan Denn
  • Re: [EM] Gerrymandering robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Gerrymandering Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Gerrymandering Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] “¡One can introduce advanced voting systems to ponies, but one cannot make the ponies implement the advanced voting systems!” ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] “¡One can introduce advanced voting systems to ponies, but one cannot make the ponies implement the advanced voting systems!” Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] “¡One can introduce advanced voting systems to ponies, but one cannot make the ponies implement the advanced voting systems!” ⸘Ŭalabio‽
  • Re: [EM] “¡One can introduce advanced voting systems to ponies, but one cannot make the ponies implement the advanced voting systems!” ⸘Ŭalabio‽
• [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Jonathan Denn
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An artist's view on voting methods Michael Allan
• [EM] Voter power! (Beta testers needed for election study) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: Advocacy aGREATER.US
• [EM] Advocacy Jonathan Denn
  • Re: [EM] Advocacy Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Advocacy Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Advocacy Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Advocacy Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Advocacy Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Did you want anchovies with your election? Richard Fobes
• [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Possibly more stable consensus government Juho Laatu
• [EM] TTR,MinMax, Losing Votes (TERW) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] TTR,MinMax, Losing Votes (TERW) Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Chris: Unbeaten-MinMax(lv) Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] More rank-method proposals and comments on new proposals Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "Natural definition" correction. Very tentative alternative proposal. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Trade CC for MMC? Weak FBC. Natural Schwartz-set definition. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Of course, when no one is beaten, choose among unbeaten by top-count. A Schwartz-set variation. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Symmetrical IC-RP(losing-votes) or Symmetrical IC-Beatpath(losing-votes)? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Sincere ranking, contd. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho: Sincere ranking, contd. Juho Laatu
• [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Chris Benham
  • [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Chris Benham
  • [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Losing Votes (ERABW) Chris Benham
• [EM] Name of "Weak Participation" Chris Benham
• [EM] monotonicity criteria Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho: Social Optimizations. The Sincere Ideal. Michael Ossipoff

• Earlier messages
• Later messages