Hi Lars,
We also intend to port the patch to a recent EMC version. It would be nice if we find a way to cooperate on this topic.
We are currently trying to use EMC in combination sercos III (www.sercos.org) (I asked about that a few weeks ago). We are using a proprietary sercos III communication stack which runs already on RT_Preempt. The stack is based on cosema (http://cosema.sourceforge.net/).
To couple EMC with the stack I applied the patches from Michael Büsch and made some other enhancements. I also added a simple shared memory interface component to HAL and semaphore support to linux_rtapi. Which seems to run quite well. A lot of further changes are also planned.
I'm planning to put the patches together with a bit of documentation and a few test results on a website within the next week.
Greetings Michael On 06/10/2011 02:01 PM, Lars Segerlund wrote:
I got the original patches from the mail below, I will clean them up so that they apply to the developement release, which reminds me, to which release/tag should I make them apliable. Also due credit to : Michael Büsch m...@bu3sch.de SInce I basicly haven't done a thing more than apply his patches by hand and start testing. / regards, Lars Segerlund On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:11 +0200, Lars Segerlund wrote:I have a question about EMC and the underlying realtime kernel, since the Linux RT-Preempt patches are 'almost' included in the mainline now, is there any effort to port EMC to this platform ?http://bu3sch.de/patches/emc-linux-rt/LATEST/ These patches worked pretty well, about 9 months ago. I did not try them recently, though. It is even usable, to some degree, with software stepgen. -- Greetings Michael. 2011/6/9 Lars Segerlund<lars.segerl...@gmail.com>:Hi guys, A while ago ( se : http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.emc.devel/3470 ) , I asked about emc2 and RT-Preempt ... I got some patches, ( thsnks ! ) , which almost applied cleanly ... ( against latest ) .. Would it be ok to apply some patches since it would be nice tho have the build system, and the configuration option of RT-Preempt atleas in the developement branch. It builds , and I can run some simulation in RT-Preempt, but I haven't gotten to do some hardware testing yet. The time is quite nice now, since linux 3.0 is missing the BKL and more realtime stuff is on it's way. What I really want to say is that it would be convienient for me :-D , but also nice to have, and it doesn't interfer with anything ... In other words , if it builds and runs, where should we stick it ? / regards, Lars Segerlund.------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Ing. Michael Abel Graduate School advanced Manufacturing Engineering GSaME - Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen ISW - Universität Stuttgart Seidenstr. 36 70174 Stuttgart Tel.: ++49 (0) 711 685-82532 Fax : ++49 (0) 711 685-82808 michael.a...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de michael.a...@gsame.uni-stuttgart.de www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de www.gsame.uni-stuttgart.de
<<attachment: michael_abel.vcf>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
