On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 11:30 -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jon Elson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > > Gentlemen,
> > >   I was just made aware of a recurring problem with the Cinci and the
> > Enshu.
> > > I have heard nothing about the Dahlih.
> > >   The Enshu is running 2.5.0-pre and Touchy interface.
> > >   The Cinci is running 2.5.0-pre and Axis interface.
> > >   Yesterday the Enshu lost Y position during a program run. The Cinci has
> > > done this previously but that was before the latest update to 10.04 and
> > > 2.5.0-pre.
> > Can you restore the machines to the older software?  How recent was the
> > upgrade?
> > What is the MTBF (sounds like about a day or so?)
> >
> > If it weren't for an apparently recent software update, I'd suspect a
> > problem in the PPMC encoder board.
> >
> 
> 
> I had a similar situation, except it was markedly worse, due to a poor
> parallel port chipset.
> 
> It was fixed 100% by upgrading to a better parport chipset.

If that is true then the communications diagnostic should make it
apparent. I've run the diag overnight w/o problems. In general, if the
ppmc paraport comm works it works very well. 

Dave
> 
> i
> 
> 
> > I have made changes in the PPMC driver, but these changes should be
> > disabled for the PPMC, since it
> > doesn't have the necessary firmware to timestamp the most recent encoder
> > count.  I'm pretty sure the
> > ppmc driver is not supposed to do anything differently if the new
> > features are not enabled.
> >
> > I suppose you could run the diagnostic program overnight with the
> > commtest test to see if any errors
> > show up.
> >
> > What is the following error tolerance in the .ini file?  If it was an
> > encoder or encoder counter problem, it should cause a sudden following
> > error of .4", which would be expected to trip the error message and stop
> > the machine.  If your following error tolerance is less than 0.4", then
> > I think the encoder reading components are off the hook, and it is
> > somehow an offset that is getting applied to the axis.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
> > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
> > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
> > Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
> Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to