I just checked, the $199 version of Alibre is almost useless.  It does not
even have Bolian operations and no CAM.    At $750 you get a 2.5 axis CAM
system and prices go up higher for more  features

FreeCAD does as much as the $750 Alibre.

To do more it seems the best option is either $500 for Fusion360 or $60 for
Solidworks.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:02 PM John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com>
wrote:

>
> I'm not paying $1000 year for AlibreCAM but then I don't have more than
> the 4th axis package nor the lathe feature.
>
> The basic AlibreCAD comes with a simple CAM module.    I doubt the low end
> Alibre for under $200 has CAM since that comes from MecSoft.
>
> MecSoft also has CAM support for RhinoCAD and for their own Visual CAD/CAM
> https://mecsoft.com/visualcadcam/
> Starting price is $595.  I've used the VisualCAD.  Not a lot different
> from the AlibreCAM since the basic engine is the same.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Strauss [mailto:ken.stra...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: September-17-20 6:56 PM
> > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> >
> > How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
> > https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be
> $1000/year
> > to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
> > thousands is not in my budget!
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
> > > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > >
> > > There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> > > If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
> > Less than $200.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> > > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > > >
> > > > Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> > > > personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file
> after
> > > > October 1, 2020.    So download your stuff now.
> > > >
> > > > OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> > > >
> > > > Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
> > for
> > > > building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not
> need
> > it
> > > > either.    OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
> > LCNC
> > > > list want CAM.
> > > >
> > > > One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for
> about
> > $270
> > > > but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> > > >
> > > > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
> > .STEP
> > > > files from any CAD system.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert <h...@hbahr.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > > > > Chris,
> > > > > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
> > expensive.
> > > > > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > > > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual
> feature is
> > > > > > extrusion screws.
> > > > > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features.
> Has
> > a
> > > > > > 30 day free demo.
> > > > > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob
> at
> > > > > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > > > > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > > > > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
> > couple
> > > > > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > > > > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > > > > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> > > > > interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since
> > 2015.
> > > > > > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to
> > learn.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > YMMV
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dave
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > > > >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths
> for
> > > > > >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/
> .
> > But
> > > > > >> unlike
> > > > > >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate
> toolpaths
> > > > > >> unless
> > > > > >> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux
> > based
> > > > > >> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software
> development.
> > > > > >> Onshape
> > > > > >> on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But
> I've
> > not
> > > > > >> figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to
> g-code.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done
> > for
> > > > > >> complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof"
> > that
> > > > > >> g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC,
> > installing
> > > > > >> Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a
> > rarely
> > > > > >> powerful Linux PC.
> > > > > >> (At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a
> long
> > > > > >> time and
> > > > > >> before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I
> > wanted to
> > > > > >> edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the
> only
> > > > > >> game in
> > > > > >> town for professional-level media editing unless you consider
> > Apple's
> > > > > >> Final
> > > > > >> Cut Pro X.    None of this runs on Linux.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C <cjv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > > > >>>> Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's
> free
> > > > > >>>> even for
> > > > > >>>> commercial use until you make $50K using it.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and
> > better
> > > > > >>>> supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>> I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C <cjv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Hello,
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then
> milling
> > > > > >>>>> them on
> > > > > >>>>> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed
> > heard,
> > > > > >>>>> that
> > > > > >>>>> you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a
> lathe.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a
> > lathe,
> > > > > >>>>> that will create g-code for it?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> thanks,
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Ron
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>>>> Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > >>>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>> Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > >>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Chris Albertson
> > > > Redondo Beach, California
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to