I got burnt by Alibre some years back with their entry level version.

I would never trust them again.

Cheers, Phill.

> On 18 Sep 2020, at 2:01 pm, Chris Albertson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I just checked, the $199 version of Alibre is almost useless.  It does not
> even have Bolian operations and no CAM.    At $750 you get a 2.5 axis CAM
> system and prices go up higher for more  features
> 
> FreeCAD does as much as the $750 Alibre.
> 
> To do more it seems the best option is either $500 for Fusion360 or $60 for
> Solidworks.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:02 PM John Dammeyer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I'm not paying $1000 year for AlibreCAM but then I don't have more than
>> the 4th axis package nor the lathe feature.
>> 
>> The basic AlibreCAD comes with a simple CAM module.    I doubt the low end
>> Alibre for under $200 has CAM since that comes from MecSoft.
>> 
>> MecSoft also has CAM support for RhinoCAD and for their own Visual CAD/CAM
>> https://mecsoft.com/visualcadcam/
>> Starting price is $595.  I've used the VisualCAD.  Not a lot different
>> from the AlibreCAM since the basic engine is the same.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ken Strauss [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: September-17-20 6:56 PM
>>> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>> 
>>> How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
>>> https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be
>> $1000/year
>>> to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
>>> thousands is not in my budget!
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: John Dammeyer [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
>>>> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
>>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>>> 
>>>> There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
>>>> If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
>>> Less than $200.
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Chris Albertson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
>>>>> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
>>>>> personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file
>> after
>>>>> October 1, 2020.    So download your stuff now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
>>> for
>>>>> building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not
>> need
>>> it
>>>>> either.    OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
>>> LCNC
>>>>> list want CAM.
>>>>> 
>>>>> One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for
>> about
>>> $270
>>>>> but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
>>> .STEP
>>>>> files from any CAD system.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris,
>>>>>>> You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
>>> expensive.
>>>>>>> Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
>>>>>>> solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual
>> feature is
>>>>>>> extrusion screws.
>>>>>>> Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features.
>> Has
>>> a
>>>>>>> 30 day free demo.
>>>>>>> https://www.webersys.com/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob
>> at
>>>>>> Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
>>>>>> supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
>>>>>> features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
>>> couple
>>>>>> or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
>>>>>> product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
>>>>>> Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
>>>>>> interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since
>>> 2015.
>>>>>>> As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to
>>> learn.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> YMMV
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
>>>>>>>> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths
>> for
>>>>>>>> lathes that runs on Linux.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/
>> .
>>> But
>>>>>>>> unlike
>>>>>>>> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate
>> toolpaths
>>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux
>>> based
>>>>>>>> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software
>> development.
>>>>>>>> Onshape
>>>>>>>> on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But
>> I've
>>> not
>>>>>>>> figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to
>> g-code.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done
>>> for
>>>>>>>> complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof"
>>> that
>>>>>>>> g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC,
>>> installing
>>>>>>>> Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a
>>> rarely
>>>>>>>> powerful Linux PC.
>>>>>>>> (At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a
>> long
>>>>>>>> time and
>>>>>>>> before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I
>>> wanted to
>>>>>>>> edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the
>> only
>>>>>>>> game in
>>>>>>>> town for professional-level media editing unless you consider
>>> Apple's
>>>>>>>> Final
>>>>>>>> Cut Pro X.    None of this runs on Linux.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's
>> free
>>>>>>>>>> even for
>>>>>>>>>> commercial use until you make $50K using it.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and
>>> better
>>>>>>>>>> supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then
>> milling
>>>>>>>>>>> them on
>>>>>>>>>>> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed
>>> heard,
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a
>> lathe.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a
>>> lathe,
>>>>>>>>>>> that will create g-code for it?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris Albertson
>>>>> Redondo Beach, California
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to