how do they get it to work on the tiny g?

https://github.com/synthetos/TinyG/wiki/Jerk-Controlled-Motion-Explained

could we not adapt and improve on the code

On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, 15:32 Feral Engineer, <theferalengin...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As someone who uses functions like g8p1, g5.1q1 and g5p10000 on mits/fanuc
> and cycle832 on Siemens, I can say that the need for high speed data
> processing functionality is pretty great. Although I don't know how
> Linuxcnc processes g code data, I do know that the aforementioned functions
> will buffer hundreds of lines of code and smooth the transitions between
> points to a certain degree of accuracy, much like calculating down to a
> nurb or spline instead of worrying about acc/dec on a point to point basis.
> Much like how lcnc has g64 with selectable accuracy, these functions offer
> selectable acc/dec settings that will either rattle your fillings or smooth
> out sharp corners to be razor perfect. I've not tried to run any of my lcnc
> machines at speeds that would make me see an eminent need for this
> functionality, but I'm sure it would be a welcomed addition.
>
> Phil T.
> The Feral Engineer
>
> Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
> www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
>
> Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction:
> www.patreon.com/theferalengineer
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021, 10:17 AM Todd Zuercher <to...@pgrahamdunn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > To my lay persons eyes I would think it would be enough to jerk limit in
> > joint space.  The limiting in Cartesian space would then take care of
> > itself.
> >
> > As to the jogging question, does it matter?  Why would jogging have to
> > have the same acceleration limits as planned motion?  Set the jogging
> > limits to something safe and conservative that won't matter if they are
> > jerk limited.
> >
> > Todd Zuercher
> > P. Graham Dunn Inc.
> > 630 Henry Street
> > Dalton, Ohio 44618
> > Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 4:50 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] jerk control
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe.
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 at 04:40, Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Actually for a machine tool, why not run the simulation off-line and
> > > use as much time and computer power as it takes.
> >
> > Feed-override?
> >
> > Do you allow infinite jerk on abort? You might think that is an easy
> > question, except that continuous jog is implemented as a move to the
> limit
> > that is aborted on key release.
> >
> > And, do we need to jerk-limit in joint space or cartesian space, or both?
> >
> > --
> > atp
> > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
> > for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
> > - George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&amp;data=04%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrahamdunn.com%7Caaabdbd2b59a4e0ad88708d966134695%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C637653055682515186%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=iD2Nxd21YC5aKx8hByW2ScEBuMjM9%2FXJCwo05FHb%2BLU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to