Lol.

On Sunday, 12 January 2025 at 07:56:04 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:

> Oh, I can show you flibber. 
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 6:52 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> @Terren. The very fact that you just make it a word game proves that you 
>> are not conscious of consciousness. I can show you qualia, but you cannot 
>> show me flibber. Try again!
>>
>> On Saturday, 11 January 2025 at 01:21:46 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>
>>> I'll counter that with *my* proof that *flibber is the only thing that 
>>> exists*:
>>> 1. Flibber = Blammo = Existence
>>> 2. To Exist means to have Blammo (you are not aware of this)
>>> 3. A Blammo is a Flibber (obviously)
>>> 4. So how can something Exist if doesn't have any Blammo?
>>> 5. And what is a Blammo if not a Flibber?
>>>
>>> It goes without saying then that anything that's not a Flibber does not 
>>> Exist. QED
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 5:52 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Terren. Is not a matter of proving. Is a matter of you becoming 
>>>> conscious of consciousness. As of yet, you have no idea what the word 
>>>> "qualia" means. If you would have known, you would have known that qualia 
>>>> = 
>>>> form = meaning = existence. You are not aware of the fact that to exist 
>>>> means to have form. And what a form is is a quality. How else can 
>>>> something 
>>>> exists if it doesn't have any form ? And what is a form if not a quality ?
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 11 January 2025 at 00:49:16 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Try to keep up. You cannot prove that only qualia exists. All you've 
>>>>> offered so far is a tautology.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 5:17 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Terren. So you say that I cannot prove that only existence exists ? 
>>>>>> Then what else exists ? Inexistence ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, 10 January 2025 at 23:16:04 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not asking you to explain existence. I'm saying you cannot prove 
>>>>>>> your claim that the only thing that *can* exist is qualia. And you 
>>>>>>> cannot prove that with a tautology. But you knew that, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:33 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Terren. Not a truism. A tautology. 1=1. Of course. What else would 
>>>>>>>> you want? How do you expect to explain existence using something 
>>>>>>>> outside of 
>>>>>>>> itself ? Is illogical. Existence exists. 1=1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quality = form = meaning. Quality looks the way it does because of 
>>>>>>>> the meaning that it does. And meaning is the way no-thing understands 
>>>>>>>> itself when it looks-back-at-itself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, 10 January 2025 at 22:12:36 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So in short, your proof is:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    1. To exist means to have quality
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    1. Only qualia have quality
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Got it. One problem though - you don't define "quality". So your 
>>>>>>>>> proof is just a truism: "Qualia are all that exist because only 
>>>>>>>>> qualia 
>>>>>>>>> exist".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have to define "quality" in a way that does not invoke 
>>>>>>>>> "existence" or "qualia". Otherwise, your proof is something a sub-100 
>>>>>>>>> IQ 
>>>>>>>>> person might come up with.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 2:44 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Terren. Information doesn't exist. "Information" is just an idea 
>>>>>>>>>> in consciousness.
>>>>>>>>>> Organ doesn't exist. "Organ" is just an idea in consciousness.
>>>>>>>>>> Brain doesn't exist. "Brain" is just an idea in consciousness.
>>>>>>>>>> Things don't exist. "Things" is just an idea in consciousness. 
>>>>>>>>>> See my other topic about PHYSICAL WOOOORLD 
>>>>>>>>>> EXIIIIISISISISTTTT!!!!! See it here for convenience:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE9a2h5ZRqA
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If qualia are about an ObJeCtIvE reality, what is the oBjEcTiVe 
>>>>>>>>>> reality that those qualia refer to ? Is it about:
>>>>>>>>>> Bart Simpson bouncing?
>>>>>>>>>> Rotating pirate ship?
>>>>>>>>>> That isn't my receipt?
>>>>>>>>>> Lobsters in motion?
>>>>>>>>>> That is embarrassing?
>>>>>>>>>> Lactates in pharmacy?
>>>>>>>>>> Baptism piracy?
>>>>>>>>>> That isn't mercy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course you can prove that qualia are all there is. 
>>>>>>>>>> Trolololololololololol. Big deal. Is the most trivial thing in the 
>>>>>>>>>> world. 
>>>>>>>>>> Qualia are all that exists because "existence" is synonymous with 
>>>>>>>>>> "quality". To exist means to have quality. If you have no quality 
>>>>>>>>>> you have 
>>>>>>>>>> no form, as such you are no-thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 50% of people are below 100. So 50% of population are 
>>>>>>>>>> scientifically proven retards.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 10 January 2025 at 17:43:06 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As John Clark (a physicalist true believer) puts it, the brute 
>>>>>>>>>>> fact or assumption is that consciousness is how it feels when data 
>>>>>>>>>>> is 
>>>>>>>>>>> processed. In this account, consciousness is the experience of 
>>>>>>>>>>> information 
>>>>>>>>>>> - the information from our sensory organs as it is processed in our 
>>>>>>>>>>> brains. 
>>>>>>>>>>> So if one accepts that theory of reality, qualia exist only as a 
>>>>>>>>>>> signal 
>>>>>>>>>>> that refers to things that exist independently of an individual's 
>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness. That's what makes it epistemological.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That version is not what I subscribe to, and I'm not trying to 
>>>>>>>>>>> convince you that's the correct account. I'm only saying, there's 
>>>>>>>>>>> no way, 
>>>>>>>>>>> not even in principle, to prove that that's the Truth of what the 
>>>>>>>>>>> ultimate 
>>>>>>>>>>> ontology is. The same goes for your account, which is that 
>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness 
>>>>>>>>>>> and qualia are all that exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> PS. By definition, an IQ of 100 is the median. So "most people" 
>>>>>>>>>>> have an IQ right around 100. And I don't mean to suggest that 
>>>>>>>>>>> because most 
>>>>>>>>>>> people take the physicalist account, that makes it more likely to 
>>>>>>>>>>> be true. 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm saying, if you're talking about your alternative, minority 
>>>>>>>>>>> theory of 
>>>>>>>>>>> reality as if it's fact, then that means you better be able to 
>>>>>>>>>>> prove it. *And 
>>>>>>>>>>> you can't* *- nobody can*, just as nobody can prove physicalism 
>>>>>>>>>>> is true.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:39 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything 
>>>>>>>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Terren. How can qualia have epistemological status when it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> exists ? Exists = ontologic. You seem very confused regarding the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of words.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, "most people" have IQ below 100. This is close to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> monkey-level. How is that a criteria on which to decide truth ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, define "energy"! Define "matter"!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 17:48:01 UTC+2 Terren Suydam 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In your theory, the quale has ontological status, ok. In 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicalism (what most people assume), qualia have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> epistemological status. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IOW, qualia is a form of information about something that exists 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> independently of our individual consciousness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In your theory, consciousness is the fundamental ontology. In 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicalism, matter & energy is the fundamental ontology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deciding what is the fundamental ontology is a metaphysical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision. It's an assumption or belief from which other things 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> follow. But 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the truth of what is the fundamental ontology cannot be proven. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:00 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Terren. Yes. What do you mean by "thing" ? The chair that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you see in front of you ? But that is just a quale in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness. So 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean by "thing" ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 02:28:05 UTC+2 Terren Suydam 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 🙄
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Terren. What thing ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 00:33:55 UTC+2 Terren Suydam 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would venture that the common sense notion of existence 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means that a thing that exists has been instantiated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d0ad42e4-836f-47b2-9738-a045aa971470n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d0ad42e4-836f-47b2-9738-a045aa971470n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8f3adf9-ae05-443c-8aeb-081807fd1ed9n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8f3adf9-ae05-443c-8aeb-081807fd1ed9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f52c2df-dfed-4224-8a56-921bc1c74d44n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f52c2df-dfed-4224-8a56-921bc1c74d44n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/efb89a4e-4c5f-406d-8337-14f10d35a88en%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/efb89a4e-4c5f-406d-8337-14f10d35a88en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/910ad8a7-012b-42f0-9bf3-ab5dae87aecfn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/910ad8a7-012b-42f0-9bf3-ab5dae87aecfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4f108bc5-a14f-4705-bf7d-26b062da6e90n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4f108bc5-a14f-4705-bf7d-26b062da6e90n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/be4be060-35ab-4cb5-a950-adf2ebe16048n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to