@Terren. Not a truism. A tautology. 1=1. Of course. What else would you 
want? How do you expect to explain existence using something outside of 
itself ? Is illogical. Existence exists. 1=1.

Quality = form = meaning. Quality looks the way it does because of the 
meaning that it does. And meaning is the way no-thing understands itself 
when it looks-back-at-itself.

On Friday, 10 January 2025 at 22:12:36 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:

>
> So in short, your proof is:
>
>    
>
>    1. To exist means to have quality
>
>
>    1. Only qualia have quality
>
> Got it. One problem though - you don't define "quality". So your proof is 
> just a truism: "Qualia are all that exist because only qualia exist".
>
> You have to define "quality" in a way that does not invoke "existence" or 
> "qualia". Otherwise, your proof is something a sub-100 IQ person might come 
> up with.
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 2:44 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> @Terren. Information doesn't exist. "Information" is just an idea in 
>> consciousness.
>> Organ doesn't exist. "Organ" is just an idea in consciousness.
>> Brain doesn't exist. "Brain" is just an idea in consciousness.
>> Things don't exist. "Things" is just an idea in consciousness. 
>> See my other topic about PHYSICAL WOOOORLD EXIIIIISISISISTTTT!!!!! See it 
>> here for convenience:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE9a2h5ZRqA
>>
>> If qualia are about an ObJeCtIvE reality, what is the oBjEcTiVe reality 
>> that those qualia refer to ? Is it about:
>> Bart Simpson bouncing?
>> Rotating pirate ship?
>> That isn't my receipt?
>> Lobsters in motion?
>> That is embarrassing?
>> Lactates in pharmacy?
>> Baptism piracy?
>> That isn't mercy?
>>
>> Of course you can prove that qualia are all there is. 
>> Trolololololololololol. Big deal. Is the most trivial thing in the world. 
>> Qualia are all that exists because "existence" is synonymous with 
>> "quality". To exist means to have quality. If you have no quality you have 
>> no form, as such you are no-thing.
>>
>> 50% of people are below 100. So 50% of population are scientifically 
>> proven retards.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 10 January 2025 at 17:43:06 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>
>>> As John Clark (a physicalist true believer) puts it, the brute fact or 
>>> assumption is that consciousness is how it feels when data is processed. In 
>>> this account, consciousness is the experience of information - the 
>>> information from our sensory organs as it is processed in our brains. So if 
>>> one accepts that theory of reality, qualia exist only as a signal that 
>>> refers to things that exist independently of an individual's consciousness. 
>>> That's what makes it epistemological.
>>>
>>> That version is not what I subscribe to, and I'm not trying to convince 
>>> you that's the correct account. I'm only saying, there's no way, not even 
>>> in principle, to prove that that's the Truth of what the ultimate ontology 
>>> is. The same goes for your account, which is that consciousness and qualia 
>>> are all that exists.
>>>
>>> PS. By definition, an IQ of 100 is the median. So "most people" have an 
>>> IQ right around 100. And I don't mean to suggest that because most people 
>>> take the physicalist account, that makes it more likely to be true. I'm 
>>> saying, if you're talking about your alternative, minority theory of 
>>> reality as if it's fact, then that means you better be able to prove it. 
>>> *And 
>>> you can't* *- nobody can*, just as nobody can prove physicalism is true.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:39 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Terren. How can qualia have epistemological status when it exists ? 
>>>> Exists = ontologic. You seem very confused regarding the meaning of words.
>>>>
>>>> Also, "most people" have IQ below 100. This is close to monkey-level. 
>>>> How is that a criteria on which to decide truth ?
>>>>
>>>> Also, define "energy"! Define "matter"!
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 17:48:01 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In your theory, the quale has ontological status, ok. In physicalism 
>>>>> (what most people assume), qualia have epistemological status. IOW, 
>>>>> qualia 
>>>>> is a form of information about something that exists independently of our 
>>>>> individual consciousness.
>>>>>
>>>>> In your theory, consciousness is the fundamental ontology. In 
>>>>> physicalism, matter & energy is the fundamental ontology.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deciding what is the fundamental ontology is a metaphysical decision. 
>>>>> It's an assumption or belief from which other things follow. But the 
>>>>> truth 
>>>>> of what is the fundamental ontology cannot be proven. 
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:00 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Terren. Yes. What do you mean by "thing" ? The chair that you see in 
>>>>>> front of you ? But that is just a quale in consciousness. So what do you 
>>>>>> mean by "thing" ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 02:28:05 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 🙄
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Terren. What thing ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 00:33:55 UTC+2 Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would venture that the common sense notion of existence means 
>>>>>>>>> that a thing that exists has been instantiated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d0ad42e4-836f-47b2-9738-a045aa971470n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d0ad42e4-836f-47b2-9738-a045aa971470n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8f3adf9-ae05-443c-8aeb-081807fd1ed9n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8f3adf9-ae05-443c-8aeb-081807fd1ed9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f52c2df-dfed-4224-8a56-921bc1c74d44n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to