I just got an email from my wholesalers, that all IBM and Seagate drives are now one year warranty...
So I will buy which ever drive sticks with the 3 year.. if its samsung, fujitsu or maxtor, I am happy to lose alittle performance in exchange for a 3 year warranty. rgds Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sridhar Dhanapalan Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 9:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Western Digital Hard Drives in Linux Take a look through the archives of the Newbie and Expert lists. There are plenty of messages detailing how bad WD drives are. In short: they don't follow the ATA spec properly, they are missing some vital CRC circuitry and they don't officially support GNU/Linux (only Windows and Solaris). Seagate is probably the only decent HDD manufacturer today. Maxtor aren't bad either, provided you get a drive with a 3-year (not 1-year) warranty. On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:43:28 +0100, "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > June-Jerry Kreps wrote: > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 05:51 am, J. Grant wrote: > > Is there any infomation on drives/manufactors that work well with linux > then? If WD are that bad I'm stuffed, i just bought a new drive from them. > > JG > > > I have two WD drives, 30 GB each, and they work great. > JLK > > luckily for me my WD drive was ranked 2nd in this review. Realy you need > a huge test set to get consistent results though > > http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1540/ > > JG -- Sridhar Dhanapalan If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com