On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:01, Chuck Burns wrote:

> The decision for war is with Saddam.  According to Hans Blix, Iraq has NOT 
> allowed U2 Flyovers, has HIDDEN documents, etc.. THEY HAVE HAD 12 YEARS to 
> COMPLY with the UN Eunuchs.. Now.. Do you think if we give him more time, do 
> you REALLY think he will use it? 

I for one watched Hans Blix for myself on C-span, the whole report.  And
what I heard (among pronoucements of unaccounted for nerve gas, mustard
gas, and various and sundry other items) was a declaration that there
was obstruction and uncooperation with the arms inspectors.  Hans said
that their team was generally displeased with the cooperation from the
Iraqi regime.

I note that as of today there are quite a few responses in this thread;
however NONE of them deal with the facts as you have presented them
here.  The fact of the matter is that the inspector's roles are NOT TO
DISARM IRAQ.  Their purpose is to CONFIRM DISARMAMENT by the existing
regime; that means that the regime has to WANT to disarm in order for
peaceful solutions to take place.  That's the only way.  If the present
regime is unable to either a) present evidence accounting for present
whereabouts of all weapons or b) allow those weapons to be found, then
it is apparent to all but morons that the regime must be disarmed by
force.  Without consequences, a UN mandate has no teeth, and therefore a
country in violation of said mandate has no accountability to anyone. 
This seems to be the aim of the "great brainwashed"; those that have
been programmed by the socialist propaganda gurgitated by the media.

> Or will he get rid of biological and 
> chemical weapons.. by SELLING them to the highest bidder?? Like terrorists?
> Like Mr Blix said, if Iraq wants to disarm, then it will, if it doesnt then it 
> won't, inspectors or not.  If Iraq wanted to disarm, it would SHOW us where 
> these weapons are hidden, instead of continuing to hide them... Iraq has had 
> 12 years to come clean, and they have not done so, and you are a fool if you 
> think that he will do it now. 

I've sat and watched specials on international TV concerning the
struggles of the Kurdish people.  There is untold suffering by these
people, and it goes completely unreported by the general media.  Why?  I
see children born mutated; I see whole villages wiped out by Saddam's
weapons, and then I change channels and I see some moron media maggot on
the screen screaming that he needs to see more proof.  I see Dr. Khidhir
Hamza, a defector scientist from Iraq, on C-Span.  Just once.  So I go
to the website to get the video; no go, not available.  So I complained
to C-Span on the phone and to the webmaster -----

"From what I understand, video from C-span programs is supposed to
remain on the C-span.org website for 15 days.  This particular video is
not up on the site, and according to your C-span staff whom I just
finished speaking to on the phone, it looks like it never was. 
Specifically the 9-19 House Armed Services meeting, where Rep Duncan
Hunter was interviewing Richard Butler and Dr. Khidhir Hamza, a nuclear
physicist defector from Iraq."

What did I get? Butkas.  Goose egg.  I never managed to get the entire
broadcast recorded.  It was never on the C-span website like all the
democratic events actually were, and I never saw it broadcast again. 
Was I surprised?  Not really.  The bottom line is that Dr Hamza defected
from Iraq and has supplied the government with much valuable information
concerning the Iraqi nuclear weapons program, which he was an integral
part of.  At the time of the weapons inspectors first stint in Iraq, he
stated that Iraq was six months away from having a viable nuclear
weapon.  He stated this in response to a question from Rep Duncan Hunter
from California in the 9-19 Armed Services Committee meeting, as I
stated above.

So if Saddam was six months away from a viable nuclear warhead 12 years
ago, where exactly does that put him now, in the face of 12 years of
total unaccountability by the UN?  The thing that bothers me about
leftists is this: they have all emotion and no facts.  Most of them
source their information primarily from mainstream media, which is
without a doubt strongly socialist/communist, and as a result carries a
set of very unamerican attitudes.  This includes sources in the USA like
CNN, MSNBC, CBS; there is hardly ANYBODY out there that even knows who
Dr Hamza is, and that is no accident.  It's also no accident that while
most C-Span tapes can be had for 25 or so bucks, they charge 150.00 for
the 9-19 Armed Services Committe recording.  Admittedly there are
alternative sources out there, like Fox News; but they are brand new
when compared to the existing media mafia.  And only now coming into
their own.

I can't get Fox at all, so I'm forced to watch CNN and it's subchannels;
and I despise every minute of it.  But I still force myself to watch
anyway, mainly because it gives me a keen perspective on where exactly
the leftists are coming from.  While I listen to dirtbags like Tom
Daschle and the Commie News Network, I also listen to other sources like
Hardball(Chris Matthews), Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and G. Gordon
Liddy.  As a result I get both liberal and conservative inputs. 

> -- 
> Chuck Burns, Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -----------===========-----------

LX

-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Kernel  2.4.18-6mdk     Mandrake Linux  8.2
Enlightenment 0.16.5-11mdk    Evolution  1.0.2-5mdk
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to