--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <sandiego108@> > > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > > As to his empathy or not, I'd say its a pretty overwhelming > > > > show of empathy to begin a world wide movement to spread a > > > > technique that eliminates suffering in its practitioners. > > > > > > This is very conceptual. Maharishi never eliminated any of my > > > "suffering." Wasn't suffering when I met him. and I am not > > > suffering now. > > > > "Very conceptual"? Is that another way of saying > > "I have no rebuttal to this"? > > I think it's a way of saying that we (Curtis > and I and many others here who saw and inter- > acted with him at close proximity for years), > as opposed to you (who studiously avoided ever > being even in the same room with him for over > 30 years) might just have a different view of > his "empathy" than you.
BZZZZZZZT. Wrong. Thanks for playing. To see why it's wrong, go back and look at the context. > (who studiously avoided ever > being even in the same room with him for over > 30 years) This is one of your most amusing mantras, Barry. <snip> > Maharishi lived in a fantasy world that he dressed > up in costumes and adorned with gold and glitz > and made pronouncements to that even a child knows > were fantasies. And yet somehow you seem to be > claiming that he was correct in his "seeing." BZZZZZZT. Wrong again, speaking of living in a fantasy world. Want to try for three?
