--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On May 4, 2009, at 6:17 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > I guess this is one of those "we agree to disagree" moments. To me, > > your oh-so- > > cogent points sidestep what I say, and apparently you feel the same > > about what > > *I* am saying. O well... > > > I'm not sidestepping--that's your obsessive POV. But this has already > been broached by Ruth and I (and others) in the past. It's already > been explained ad nauseam. If you didn't get it before, it means you > either aren't listening, can't listen or just aren't able to hear it. > I'd rather discuss the new, cutting edge stuff coming out at events > like Mind and Life 18 or the Harvard conference last weekend, than > lament over your spilt milk again! > > Of course should something eventually come out on TM that is > reputable, worthwhile and new--sure I'd love to hear it. I'm just not > holding my breath on that one. The same old relaxation response > findings just aren't that exciting for those of us interested in > higher states of consciousness. >
As I said, we agree to disagree... Lawson
